Wednesday, December 31, 2008

His voice is beautiful but he recites Qunoot in Fajr every Friday; should I pray Taraweeh behind him?

We have an imam in our area whom Allaah has blessed with a beautiful voice which sends shivers down the spine, but this imam has a habit which is closer to innovation: he recites Qunoot in Fajr every Friday. What is the ruling on praying behind him even if it is a naafil prayer, such as qiyaam al-layl (night prayers) in Ramadaan [i.e., Taraweeh]? Please note that there are many mosques – praise be to Allaah – but their imams have ordinary voices.

Praise be to Allaah.

Firstly:

The scholars differed concerning the ruling on reciting Qunoot in Fajr prayer every day. Some of them are of the view that it is Sunnah, and others are of the view that it is a reprehensible innovation (bid’ah).

The second view is the correct one. That has been discussed in the answer to question no. 20031.

Thus it is clear that what this imam is doing is something innovated for which there is no basis.

So he should be advised to think again about what he is doing, and he should follow one of the two opinions mentioned above: either to recite Qunoot in Fajr every day or to forego reciting Qunoot, depending on what evidence he thinks is most valid.

Secondly:

With regard to praying Taraweeh behind him, there is no reason why you should not do so, because the fact that he recites Qunoot in Fajr has nothing to do with Taraweeh prayer. Moreover, it seems that he recites Qunoot in Fajr on Friday on the basis of a misinterpretation, thinking that there is some special virtue in that.

Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz (may Allaah have mercy on him) was asked:

What is the ruling on going to different mosques, seeking out an imam with a beautiful voice, because of the khushoo’ (humility) and proper focus on prayer which result from that?

He replied:

It seems – and Allaah knows best – that there is nothing wrong with that, if the aim is to seek help by means of that in developing proper humility and focus in prayer, and to find joy in prayer and find tranquillity in his heart, because not every voice brings joy. So if the aim in going to hear the voice of one imam or another is the desire to seek good and to perfect one’s focus in prayer, then there is nothing wrong with that; rather it is to be appreciated, and he will be rewarded according to his intention. A person may attain khushoo’ behind one imam and not behind another, because of the difference between the two recitations and the two prayers. So if the intention behind going to a distant mosque is to listen to the imam’s recitation because of his beautiful voice, and to benefit from them, and so that he will focus properly in his prayer, and not just because of whims and desires or for a change of scene, rather it is for the purpose of benefit and knowledge, and seeking to attain khushoo’ in prayer, then there is nothing wrong with that. It is proven in the saheeh hadeeth that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “The people who will receive the greatest reward for prayer is those who walk the furthest [to the mosque], then those who walk the next furthest.” So if his intention is also to increase the number of steps he takes, that is also a good aim. End quote.

Fataawa al-Shaykh Ibn Baaz (11/328, 329).

And Allaah knows best.



Ruling on offering congratulations at the beginning of the Hijri year

What is the ruling on offering congratulations on the occasion of the Hijri new year and saying “Kull ‘aam wa antum bi khayr” or praying for blessing, or sending a card with best wishes for blessings in the new year?

Praise be to Allaah.

Shaykh Muhammad ibn Saalih al-‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) was asked: What is the ruling on congratulating people on the occasion of the Hijri new year, and how should one reply to a person who offers congratulations?

He replied:

If someone offers you congratulations, then respond to him, but do not initiate such greetings. This is the correct view concerning this matter. So if a person says to you, for example, “Happy New Year”, then you can say, “May Allaah make it a good and blessed year for you.” But you should not initiate such a greeting, because I do not know of any report that the salaf [early generations of Islam] congratulated one another on the occasion of the new year, rather the salaf did not regard the first of Muharram as the first day of the new year until the caliphate of ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab (may Allaah be pleased with him.

Shaykh ‘Abd al-Kareem al-Khudayr said concerning offering congratulations on the occasion of the hijri new year:

Praying for another Muslim in general terms, in phrases that are not meant as a kind of ritual on special occasions such as Eid, is acceptable, especially if what is meant by this greeting is friendship and to show a friendly face to one’s fellow Muslim. Imaam Ahmad (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: “I do not initiate the greeting but if someone greets me I return the greeting, because responding to the greeting is obligatory. But being the first to offer congratulations is neither Sunnah nor forbidden.


‘Umar did not seek the help of Allaah by virtue of the status of al-‘Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with him)

Hadeeth: Anas ibn Maalik (may Allaah be pleased with him) narrated that when they suffered drought, ‘Umar (may Allaah be pleased with him) would seek rain by virtue of al-‘Abbaas ibn ‘Abd al-Muttalib, and he would say: “O Allaah, we used to ask You for rain by virtue of our Prophet and You gave us rain. Now we ask You for rain by virtue of the paternal uncle of our Prophet, so give us rain” and they would be given rain. Is this saheeh? Is this evidence that it is permissible to seek the help of Allaah by virtue of the status of the awliya’ (close friends of Allaah)?.

Praise be to Allaah.

The hadeeth referred to by the questioner is a saheeh hadeeth which was narrated by al-Bukhaari, but anyone who studies it will find that it is evidence that one should not seek help from Allaah by virtue of the status of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) or of anyone else, because tawassul (using a means to achieve a goal) and al-waseelah is the thing that helps you to achieve that goal. The waseelah referred to in this hadeeth (“we used to ask You for rain by virtue of our Prophet and You gave us rain. Now we ask You for rain by virtue of the paternal uncle of our Prophet, so give us rain” and they would be given rain) is seeking the help of Allah by virtue of the du’aa’ of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), as a man said: “O Messenger of Allaah, our wealth has been destroyed and the roads are cut off, so pray to Allaah to help us.” And because ‘Umar said to al-‘Abbaas: “Get up, O ‘Abbaas, and pray to Allaah, so he prayed to Allaah.” If this had come under the heading of seeking Allaah’s help by virtue of a person’s status only, then ‘Umar (may Allaah be pleased with him) would have sought the help ofo Allaah by virtue of the status of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) before doing so by virtue of the status of al-‘Abbaas, because the status of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is greater before Allaah than that of al-‘Abbaas or anyone else. If this hadeeth came under the heading of seeking the help of Allaah by virtue of status that it would have been more appropriate for the ameer al-mu’mineen ‘Umar (may Allaah be pleased with him) to seek the help of Allaah by virtue of the status of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), not the status of al-‘Abbaas ibn ‘Abd al-Muttalib.

To sum up, there is nothing wrong with seeking the help of Allaah by means of the du’aa’ of a person who it is hoped will have his du’aa’s answered because of his righteousness. The Sahaabah (may Allaah be pleased with them) used to seek the help of Allaah by means of the du’aa’ of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) for them. Similarly, ‘Umar sought the help of Allaah by means of the du’aa’ of al-‘Abbaas ibn ‘Abd al-Muttalib (may Allaah be pleased with him). So if you think a man is righteous and likely to have his du’aa’s answered because his food, drink, clothing and housing are halaal, and because he is known to be a man of worship and piety, there is nothing wrong with asking him to pray to Allaah for you and ask for what you like, on condition that this does not stir up self-admiration in this person whom you ask to make du’aa’ for you. If it does stir up self-admiration, then it is not permissible for you to doom him by making this request of him, because that will harm him.

I also say: This is permissible, but I do not recommend it. I think that each person should ask Allaah by himself, without appointing any intermediary between him and Allaah. That brings a greater hope and is nearer to fear of Allaah. I also encourage anyone who asks his brother whose du’aa’s he hopes will be answered to make du’aa’ for him, to intend thereby to treat him kindly – i.e., the one who will make du’aa’ – and not do it for the sake of meeting his own needs, because if he asks him for the sake of meeting his own needs, then it will become like asking him for money and the like, which is blameworthy. But if he intends thereby to benefit his brother who will make du’aa’ by treating him kindly, then treating a Muslim kindly is something for which a person will be rewarded, as is well known – and that is better. And Allaah is the source of strength. End quote.

Majmoo’ Fataawa wa Rasaa’il Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (2/277).

For more information on the hadeeth about ‘Umar seeking the help of Allaah by virtue of al-‘Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with them both) and the fact that this tawassul was by virtue of his du’aa’ and not of his status, please see the book al-Tawassul by Shaykh al-Albaani (may Allaah have mercy on him), pp. 50-68.


Saturday, December 27, 2008

It is not permissible to congratulate the kuffaar on their festivals in any way whatsoever

In light of Christmas and the coming New Year, here is a relevant article:


It is not permissible to congratulate the kuffaar on their festivals in any way whatsoever

What is the ruling on eating the food (rice, meat, chicken or cake) that is given to us by a Christian friend that he made for his birthday or for Christmas or the Christian New Year? What is your opinion on congratulating him by saying, “Insha Allaah you will continue to do well this year” so as to avoid saying Kull ‘aam wa antum bi khayr (approx. “season’s greetings”) or “Happy New Year” etc?.

Praise be to Allaah.

It is not permissible for a Muslim to eat things that the Jews and Christians make on their festivals, or what they give him as a gift on their festivals, because that is cooperating with them and joining in with them in this evil, as is explained in question no. 12666.

It is not permissible for him to congratulate them on their festivals in any way whatsoever, because that implies approval of their festival and not denouncing them, and helping them to manifest their symbols and propagate their innovation, and sharing their happiness during their festivals, which are innovated festivals that are connected to false beliefs that are not approved of in Islam. See also question no. 47322.

And Allaah knows best.


Islam Q&A


http://www.islam-qa.com/en/ref/81977

Saturday, December 20, 2008

Why we can't Attach Our Feet in Salaah

Author: Shaykh Muhammad ibn 'Abdil Wahhaab al 'Aqeel

Topic: Did you know

Reference: Audio tape - more about reference here...


…and from it is the saying of Anas, may Allaah be pleased with him, in a Sunnah from the Sunan of Salaat; and it is the spacing in the Salaat; that a Muslim stands beside his Muslim brother and attaches is feet, knees and shoulders to his brother without being excessive or negligent, as was legislated by the Messenger – صلى الله عليه وسلم – who said:

“You will straighten your lines or Allaah will separate between your hearts or faces.”

This is why when the hearts have become separated during this time, so did the feet. Why is it that we can’t attach our feet to each other’s feet? It is because our hearts are detached from one another, if our hearts were attached to one another, our feet would also be attached. This is why if a person who loves you and whom you love were to put his foot over yours, you would not get upset, you would not say; ‘why is he bothering me’, this is because your heart loves him. But because there is a detachment between you and him, you cannot stand that he attaches his foot to yours let alone that he puts his foot over yours.

This is why Anas, may Allaah be pleased with him, when he describes his state at the time of the Messenger of Allaah – صلى الله عليه وسلم – and his state after that, he says; “At the time of the Messenger – صلى الله عليه وسلم – we would attach our feet to our brother’s feet, and our knees to our brother’s knees, and our shoulders to our brother’s shoulders, in obedience to the Messenger’s orders – صلى الله عليه وسلم - , but if we were to do so today, he would escape like an obstinate mule.”

By Allaah I saw with my own eyes here in Madeenah, a man wanted to attach his foot to his brother’s foot, by Allaah his brother cut his Salaat, he cut his Salaat and left the whole first line and went to the second line. He left the first line to escape this Sunnah, and the cause of this is ignorance, may Allaah preserve you. This is why we must teach the people the Sunnah of the Prophet – صلى الله عليه وسلم – because people are enemies to what they are ignorant of.


http://subulassalaam.com/articles/article.cfm?article_id=79

Monday, December 08, 2008

The Ultimate Aim of Yoga

I'd like to quote from the Chairman of the National Fatwa Council of Malaysia himself, Datuk Dr Abdul Shukor Husin, which was quoted by The New Paper in an article on page 16, a few weeks back:

"Many Muslims in the country fail to understand the ultimate aim of Yoga. It combines physical movements, religious elements, chanting and worshiping for the purpose of achieving inner peace and ultimately be one with God."

Thus, it is a COMBINATION of physical, mental and spiritual elements to be one with God..

Thus, to say that the mere physical form of Yoga is permissible is a false claim and judgement.. Because it is obvious that Yoga is not an exercise but converted in to an exercise, compared to Silat or other Martial Arts that are really meant as an exercise..

To form an analogy between Yoga and Silat is obviously an invalid qiyas.

What would we say if someone were to take some forms of movements from the Muslim prayer and make it into an exercise?

Wallahu a'lam

George Yeo akui hikmah disebalik pengharaman insurans dan wang faedah

TURUT AMBIL KIRA PENCAPAIAN DUNIA ISLAM Yeo: Pendekatan demikian bantu semai sikap saling hormat-menghormati antara Islam dengan bukan Islam

MASYARAKAT dunia harus melihat agama Islam pada perspektif yang meluas dengan turut mengambil kira pencapaian penting dalam Dunia Islam.

Ini kerana pendekatan sedemikian mampu membantu menyemai sikap saling hormat-menghormati di kalangan masyarakat Islam dan bukan Islam hari ini.

Kegagalan masyarakat untuk berbuat demikian akan hanya mengakibatkan seseorang itu memperlekehkan hubungan antara kaum dan dalam mencari penyelesaian terhadap masalah-masalah yang ada.

Demikian pandangan Menteri Ehwal Luar, Encik George Yeo, semasa berucap dalam majlis makan malam semasa merasmikan Persidangan Projek Pemerintahan Global S. T. Lee di Hotel Four Seasons Jumaat lalu.

Dalam ucapannya, Encik Yeo memberikan contoh satu pencapaian Islam yang seharusnya dijadikan iktibar kepada masyarakat dunia - iaitu nilai-nilai Islam yang mengharamkan insurans dan kadar faedah.

'Kita berada di tengah-tengah krisis kewangan. Banyak yang ditulis mengenai pengharaman pembayaran insurans dan wang faedah dalam Islam. Kita pernah mentertawakan pengharaman yang aneh ini, namun terdapat kebijaksanaan dalamnya,' ujar Encik Yeo.

Beliau berkata keprihatinan yang tersemat berhubung beberapa peraturan kewangan Islam adalah mengenai bahaya moral apabila kepentingan mereka yang membuat tuntutan mula menyimpang.

'Apabila kita lihat masalah dunia kewangan hari ini dan apa punca krisis ini, ia disebabkan keinginan mereka yang membuat tuntutan itu ditentang. Jadi, ada sesuatu dalam kewangan Islam yang betul-betul masuk akal,' ujar Encik Yeo.

Encik Yeo menambah, dalam memerangi pengganasan, dunia juga harus mengenang pencapaian Islam dalam membangunkan kegemilangan tamadunnya seperti pemerintahan Islam di Samarkand, Bukhara, Damsyik, Baghdad, Kahirah dan Cordoba.

Encik Yeo juga merujuk kepada sebuah pameran tamadun Islam di Musee d'Orsay, sebuah muzium di Paris.

Pameran yang sama juga kini boleh dilihat di Muzium Seni Islam di Doha, Qatar, yang direka arkitek Amerika Syarikat kelahiran China, Ieoh Ming Pei.

Projek Pemerintahan Global ini merupakan sebuah projek tiga tahun yang bakal mengumpulkan pemikir- pemikir dan pengamal-pengamal terbaik dari seluruh dunia Barat dan Timur untuk membangunkan wawasan dan saranan tentang cara memerintah dunia, termasuk Asia yang pesat membangun.

'Apabila kita membincangkan tentang pemerintahan global, ia perlu dibina atas dasar menghormati sesama manusia dan menghormati kepelbagaian yang ada padanya.

'Dalam pemerintahan global, secara dasarnya kita harus mengiktiraf kepelbagaian dan perbezaan ini,' ujar Encik Yeo.

Projek yang merangkumi beberapa kumpulan kerja itu akan menghasilkan sejumlah kertas kerja, pelan dasar, artikel akademik dan buku sepanjang projek tersebut.

Beberapa bengkel dan persidangan antarabangsa turut dirancang.

It dipengerusikan bersama oleh Dekan Sekolah Dasar Awam Lee Kuan Yew (LKYSPP), Profesor Kishore Mahbubani and Pengarah Pusat Asia dan Globalisasi (CAG), Profesor Ann Florini.

[BH, 8 Dec 2008. http://cyberita.asia1.com.sg/singapura/story/0,3617,131889,00.html?]


Ibn Shamsud-Deen:

Kebenaran akan unggul juga. Hikmah pengharaman bayaran insurans dan wang faedah kini diakui dan dirasakan oleh orang bukan Islam, Allahu Akbar!

Tapi sedih sekali bila orang Islam sendiri masih terlibat dengan insurans.. bukan sahaja mereka jahil tentang pengharamannya, malah mereka merasakannya sebagai suatu keperluan, na'udzu billah..

Apakah kerana dirasakan sebagai keperluan, jika ada ulama atau majlis fatwa yang mengeluarkan fatwa mengharamkannya, akan muncul pihak2 tertentu dan suara-suara sumbang membantah fatwa tersebut atas "hujjah" ianya suatu "keperluan yang bermanfaat", sebagaimana muncul suara tersebut membantah fatwa yang dikeluarkan Majlis Fatwa Kebangsaan M'sia berkenaan Yoga?

Inilah petanda akhir zaman...

Saturday, December 06, 2008

Contemporary VS Classical

In the period where more people tend to recite the Qur'an following the melodious styles of contemporary recitors such as Shaykh Mishary Rashid al-Afasy, I seem to find more peace, comfort and tranquility in the classical recitations the likes of Shaykh Shuraym, Shaykh Mahmoud al-Husary, Shaykh Abdullah Basfar.. the style of recitation that those lovers of Mishary might find boring or monotonous..

But it is in these classical recitations that somehow I feel the beuaty of the Quranic recitation with clear tajweed.. unlike the contemporary ones which at times sound like mere melody.. especially when recited by imitators who perhaps tend to follow the melody more than actually paying attention to Tajweed..

I don't know.. it's just what i feel..

Friday, November 28, 2008

Research needed into causes of terrorism – Naif

ref: http://www.saudigaz ette.com. sa/index. cfm?method= home.regcon&contentID=200811282 3205

MADINA – Prince Naif Bin Abdul Aziz, Minister of Interior, spoke Wednesday at the Islamic University in Madina on terrorism-related subject, foremost among them the problem of deviant thought, critics of the Salafist approach, misguided use of the Internet, rehabilitation of detained deviants and the role of senior scholars.

The Interior Minister, addressing university students and staff in a dialogue session, said he had asked the Imam Mohammed Bin Saud and the King Saud universities in Riyadh to conduct research into why “such people slide into involvement in such acts and how the issue can be successfully dealt with.”

He said the creation of a national strategic plan and a national research center to confront deviant thought was a subject worthy of attention.

“I have spoken often of the need for intellectual security that not only keeps up with but advances ahead of public security,” he said. “The Saudi citizen is the most important security officer. We require substantial research into the causes of terrorism and what pushes terrorists into it. This research should identify evidence in as objective a fashion as possible.”

“Our thought and ideas in our world of both today and yesterday, will remain, and we must stay with what is correct and instruct the next generation in it. We fear first and foremost Allah, and we should not err by accepting un-Islamic approaches. The truth should only be defended with proof, for we are in great need of security.”

As to the research center, Prince Naif said that King Abdullah had proposed an international research center to combat terrorism to some 54 nations. “We hope,” he said, “to see this proposal realized in the near future.”

When asked about suggestions to encourage institutions by creating an award for combating deviant thought in the name of the Prince, he responded by saying that the subject had been discussed and that the prize would be more deserving of bearing the name of King Abdullah, Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques.

Prince Naif then revealed that the Ministry of Interior had foiled around 160 terrorist operations in the Kingdom.

“If the terrorists had succeeded in only 20 to 30 percent of their intended plans,” the Prince warned, “it would have caused a genuine catastrophe.”

Prince Naif went on to talk of the dialogue of ideas, describing any failure to confront ideas with ideas as a reflection of lack of effort.

“There are still in our time conflicting ideas and it is up to us to be aware of who are active in this field. They are known to us, we know who they belong to, and we know their thought. Their presence enables us to identify any thought emanating from those principles and ideas, and therefore we do not rule out the existence of anti-Islamic motives in general and against this nation, the nation of the Prophet’s Sunnah.”

Prince Naif continued by addressing critics of Salafism in the media saying that their attacks are unfounded and that they try to blow trivial matters out of all proportion.

“This must be challenged with correct knowledge and it is the jurisprudents of Islam who are best equipped to do that.”

“We are a Salafi nation built on the Qur’an and we take pride in that and everyone knows it. Salafism is not a sect. It is not one of the four schools. It is the approach taught to us by the Prophet (peace be upon him).”

The Prince continued by describing the history of the Saudi states and all the efforts made to preserve the Kingdom’s path up to this day.

The Prince also commented on the use of the Internet which is widely believed to be used to recruit youth and attract them toward deviant thought by saying that the Internet can be used in both meaningful and harmful ways, and while there is no international law limiting freedom of speech we have to be able to distinguish between the good and the bad.

The Prince spoke of the committee charged with advising detainees and correcting thought as performing a duty and achieving the desired goals.

“People cannot say,” said the Prince, “that the committee has applied any pressure or malpractice in its investigations. They have met hundreds of people and they have seen the truth.”

Prince Naif said dangers can be avoided through a review of the prevailing global system.

“It is clear,” he said, “that it is incumbent upon all Muslims, and most notably the Muslim scholars and seekers of knowledge and callers to Islam to take part in solving the problems and crises of human society.” – Okaz/SG

Saturday, November 22, 2008

Menteri: Niqab Hanya Adat

KAHIRAH: Kementerian Ehwal Agama Mesir kini menyertai perdebatan mengenai sama ada seorang wanita Muslimah patut memakai kerudung muka (niqab), dengan menerbitkan sebuah buku yang berhujah bahawa ia tidak termasuk ajaran Islam.

Akhbar Al-Masry al-Yom menyiarkan sedutan buku itu, bermaksud Kerudung (niqab) itu adat, bukan ibadat, oleh Menteri Ehwal Agama, Encik Mahmud Hamdi Zaqzuq, yang akan diagihkan pihak kementerian kepada masjid-masjid.

'Saya tidak akan membenarkan budaya niqab merebak di Mesir,' kata beliau seperti dinukil akhbar berkenaan.

Pemakaian kerudung dibahaskan beberapa mazhab Sunni, dengan majoriti berkata amalan itu tidak wajib.

Namun semua mazhab akur wanita harus menutup aurat keculi muka dan tangan.

Buku Encik Zaqzuq menukil fatwa Mufti Mesir, Rektor Universiti Al-Azhar dan ulama lain bahawa pemakaian niqab tidak bersandarkan Al-Quran atau Hadis.

Di Mesir, pemakaian niqab sering dikait dengan pengikut Salafi, yang merupakan aliran pemikiran utama di Arab Saudi.

Kementerian Ehwal Agama Mesir sebelum ini mengumumkan ia akan menerbitkan buku-buku yang membantah fahaman Salafi dan akan mengagihkannya ke masjid- masjid.

Pakar sosiologi, Cik Mona Abaza berkata di Mesir, 80 peratus wanita memakai kerudung. Tetapi baru-baru ini dekan Univerisiti Helwan memberhentikan pelajar wanita yang memakai kerudung.

Cik Soad Saleh, bekas pensyarah Fakulti Syariah di Universiti Al-Azhar, juga berkata niqab tidak wajib. -- AFP.

http://cyberita.asia1.com.sg/luarnegara/story/0,3617,131044,00.html?


Ibn Shamsud-Deen:

Untuk mengatakan pemakaian niqab tidak bersandarkan al-Qur'an dan Hadith, barangkali mereka tidak mempelajari hadith dengan teliti.

Larangan Rasulullah agar wanita tidak memakai niqab mahupun sarung tangan semasa ihram jelas menunjukkan ada sandarannya di dalam hadith. Begitu juga adalah sangat mafhum para isteri Rasulullah memakai niqab, sehingga pemakaian niqab disebutkan sebagai Sunnah para isteri Rasulullah.

Walaupun ana secara peribadi setuju dengan pandangan dan hujjah Syeikh al-Albani dan mendukung pendapat jumhur ulama bahawa niqab itu tidak wajib, ana begitu tersentak apabila sang menteri ini membuat kenyataan ianya tiada sandaran dalam al-Qur'an dan as-Sunnah. Apatah lagi apabila beliau mendakwa menukil fatwa dari para ulama.

Jika benar demikian, apakah para ulama yang beliau tukil fatwa mereka tidak melihat wujudnya khilaf tentang sama ada niqab itu wajib ataupun tidak? Tidakkah mereka melihat para ulama yang berpendapat niqab itu wajib (seperti Syeikhul Islam Ibnu Taimiyyah) memiliki kekuatan hujjah? Bahkan, ana secara peribadi melihat kedua-dua pihak memiliki kekuatan hujjah, lalu akhirnya ana lebih cenderung kepada hujjah Syeikh al-Albani dan pendapat jumhur ulama.

Lalu apakah para ulama yang berpendapat niqab itu wajib hanya menyimpulkan pendapat demikian berdasarkan ijtihad semata-mata tanpa dalil nas?

'ala kulli hal, bila diteliti artikel di atas, jelas motif sebenar.. motif sebenar bukanlah untuk membasmikan budaya niqab tapi lebih kepada membanteras fahaman Salafi.. kerana Kementerian Hal Ehwal Agama Mesir telah mengumumkan akan menerbitkan buku-buku yang membantah fahaman Salafi dan diagihkan ke masjid-masjid.

Mufti Mesir Syeikh Ali Gomaa memang dikenali sebagai anti-Wahhabi/Salafi.. video ceramah beliau membantah fahaman Salafi boleh didapati di Youtube..

Dua kesimpulan boleh dibuat:

1) Menarik kan? Mereka kononnya berpegang kepada fikrah yang menyatukan semua golongan/fahaman dalam umat Islam, yakni fikrah Hasan al-Banna yang menyeru agar setiap golongan/fahaman bersatu atas dasar yang sama.. tapi mereka begitu benci kepada "fahaman" Salafi sehingga ingin dibantah habis-habis..

2) Perkembangan ini menunjukkan bahawa da'wah Salafiyyah semakin berkembang, khususnya di Mesir.. dan yang ana tahu, antara yang gigih berda'wah di sana ialah Syeikh Muhammad Hasan, Syeikh Muhammad Hussain Ya'qub dan Syeikh Abu Ishaq al-Huwainy.. Moga Allah melimpahkan rahmat, taufiq dan hidayah-Nya kepada mereka dan para penda'wah Salafi yang lainnya di Mesir.

Wa billahi at-Taufiq wa al-Hidayah.

Thursday, November 20, 2008

Definition of udhiyah and ruling thereon

What is meant by udhiyah (sacrifice)? Is it obligatory or Sunnah?.

Praise be to Allaah.

The word udhiyah means an animal of the ‘an’aam class (i.e., camel, cow, sheep or goat) that is slaughtered during the days of Eid al-Adha because of the Eid and as an act of worship, intending to draw closer to Allaah thereby.

This is one of the rituals of Islam prescribed in the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of His Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), and according to the consensus of the Muslims.

In the Qur’aan:

1 – Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“Therefore turn in prayer to your Lord and sacrifice (to Him only)”

[al-Kawthar 108:2]

2 – Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“Say (O Muhammad): Verily, my Salaah (prayer), my sacrifice, my living, and my dying are for Allaah, the Lord of the ‘Aalameen (mankind, jinn and all that exists).

He has no partner. And of this I have been commanded, and I am the first of the Muslims”

[al-An’aam 6:162]

The word nusuk (translated here as sacrifice) means sacrifice; this is the view of Sa’eed ibn Jubayr. And it was said that it means all acts of worship, including sacrifice, which is more comprehensive.

3 – Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“And for every nation We have appointed religious ceremonies, that they may mention the Name of Allaah over the beast of cattle that He has given them for food. And your Ilaah (God) is One Ilaah (God Allaah), so you must submit to Him Alone (in Islam). And (O Muhammad) give glad tidings to the Mukhbitoon [those who obey Allaah with humility and are humble from among the true believers of Islamic Monotheism]”

[al-Hajj 22:34]

In the Sunnah:

1 – It was narrated in Saheeh al-Bukhaari (5558) and Saheeh Muslim (1966) that Anas ibn Maalik (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: “The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) sacrificed two white rams speckled with black. He slaughtered them with his own hand, said ‘Allaahu akbar’ and put his foot on their necks.”

2 – It was narrated that ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Umar (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: “The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) stayed in Madeenah for ten years, offering sacrifice (every year on Eid).” Narrated by Ahmad, 4935; al-Tirmidhi, 1507; classed as hasan by al-Albaani in Mishkaat al-Masaabeeh, 1475.

3 – It was narrated from ‘Uqbah ibn ‘Aamir (may Allaah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) shared out sacrificial animals amongst his companions, and ‘Uqbah got a sheep that was six months old. He said, “O Messenger of Allaah, I got a sheep that is six months old.” He said, “Offer it as a sacrifice.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 5547.

4 – It was narrated from al-Baraa’ ibn ‘Aazib (may Allaah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Whoever offers a sacrifice after the prayer has completed his rituals (of Eid) and has followed the way of the Muslims.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 5545.

The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) offered sacrifices, as did his companions (may Allaah be pleased with them). And he said that sacrifice is the way of the Muslims.

Hence the Muslims are unanimously agreed that it is prescribed in Islam, as was narrated by more than one of the scholars.

But they differed as to whether it is Sunnah mu’akkadah (a confirmed Sunnah) or it is obligatory and it is not permissible to omit it.

The majority of scholars are of the view that it is Sunnah mu’akkadah. This is the view of al-Shaafa’i, Maalik and Ahmad according to his most well-known view.

Others were of the view that it is obligatory. This is the view of Abu Haneefah and one of the views narrated from Ahmad. This was also the view favoured by Ibn Taymiyah who said: “This is one of the views narrated in the madhhab of Maalik, or it appears to be the view of Maalik.”

From Risaalat Ahkaam al-Udhiyah wa’l-Dhakaah by Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him).

Shaykh Muhammad ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: “Udhiyah is Sunnah mu’akkadah for the one who is able to do it, so a person should offer the sacrifice on behalf of himself and the members of his household.”

Fataawa Ibn ‘Uthaymeen, 2/661.


Islam Q&A

http://www.islam-qa.com/en/ref/36432


Ibn Shamsud-Deen:
This is indeed a matter of khilaf. Unlike some of our shadeed brothers who insist that the correct opinion is that it is wajib, as though all the mashayikh view so. Again, it is a matter of khilaf and they'll be surprised to know that Shaykh Ibn 'Uthaymeen himself favoured the view that it is only Sunnah Mu'akkadah. Wallahu a'lam

There is nothing wrong with trimming the moustache or shave it altogether

I trim my moustache so short that it cant be seen... is that correct? Are we allowed to say Al Hussayn was a Martyr?.

Praise be to Allaah.

The scholars are unanimously agreed that it is permissible to trim or cut the moustache, because of the many ahaadeeth that have been narrated concerning that, such as the words of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him): “Let the beard grow, and trim the moustache.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari (5442). And he (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Whoever does not remove anything from the moustache is not one of us.” Narrated by al-Tirmidhi (2685) and classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh al-Tirmidhi.

Al-Nawawi (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in al-Majmoo’ (1/340)” As for cutting the moustache, there is unanimous agreement that it is Sunnah. End quote.

But there is a difference of opinion among the scholars as to how much may be removed.

Al-Shawkaani said in Nayl al-Awtaar (1/148): The people differed as to the amount that may be cut from the moustache. Many of the salaf were of the view that it may be removed completely and shaved off, because of the apparent meaning of the words shave and remove completely. This was the view of the Kufis [and is one view narrated from Imam Ahmad. What is meant by the Kufis is the followers of Abu Haneefah (may Allaah have mercy on him)].

Many others were of the view that it is not allowed to shave it or remove it completely. This was the view of Maalik [and of al-Shaafa’i and of Ahmad, according to another report from him].

Imam Maalik was very strict about shaving the moustache and regarded it as mutilation for which a person deserved to be disciplined. He said that shaving it was a bid’ah (innovation) which had appeared among the people. This was narrated from him by al-Nawawi in al-Majmoo’ and by Ibn al-Qayyim in Zaad al-Ma’aad and others, but the majority of scholars were of a different view, as they thought that there was nothing wrong with shaving or cutting it, although they differed as to which is better. End quote.

Al-Mardaawi said in al-Insaaf (1/121): He may shave his moustache or trim the ends, but shaving is better. This was stated by him [i.e., Imam Ahmad]. End quote.

Ibn al-Qayyim stated in Zaad al-Ma’aad (1/171) that Imam Ahmad (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: If he shaves it there is nothing wrong with it, and if he cuts it there is nothing wrong with it. The evidence that Imam Ahmad quoted for that is that the ahaadeeth enjoined shaving and cutting.

Hence the brother who asked this question may know that there is nothing wrong with what he is doing, although it is better to cut the moustache so that the edge of the lip appears, and not to remove it altogether, because this is what the Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) used to do. It was narrated that Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) used to cut his moustache. Narrated by Ahmad (2733). Shaykh Ahmad Shaakir said: Its isnaad is saheeh.


Islam Q&A

http://www.islam-qa.com/en/ref/98500

Saturday, November 15, 2008

Salafism = Ultraconservative Islam?

Ultraconservative Islam on rise in Mideast

By PAUL SCHEMM, Associated Press Writer Paul Schemm, Associated Press Writer Sun Oct 19, 11:56 am ET

CAIRO, Egypt – The Muslim call to prayer fills the halls of a Cairo computer shopping center, followed immediately by the click of locking doors as the young, bearded tech salesmen close shop and line up in rows to pray.

Business grinding to a halt for daily prayers is not unusual in conservative Saudi Arabia, but until recently it was rare in the Egyptian capital, especially in affluent commercial districts like Mohandiseen, where the mall is located.

But nearly the entire three-story mall is made up of computer stores run by Salafis, an ultraconservative Islamic movement that has grown dramatically across the Middle East in recent years.

"We all pray together," said Yasser Mandi, a salesman at the Nour el-Hoda computer store. "When we know someone who is good and prays, we invite them to open a shop here in this mall." Even the name of Mandi's store is religious, meaning "Light of Guidance."

Critics worry that the rise of Salafists in Egypt, as well as in other Arab countries such as Jordan and Lebanon, will crowd out the more liberal and tolerant version of Islam long practiced there. They also warn that the doctrine is only a few shades away from that of violent groups like al-Qaida — that it effectively preaches "Yes to jihad, just not now."

In the broad spectrum of Islamic thought, Salafism is on the extreme conservative end. Saudi Arabia's puritanical Wahhabi interpretation is considered its forerunner, and Saudi preachers on satellite TV and the Internet have been key to its Salafism's spread.

Salafist groups are gaining in numbers and influence across the Middle East. In Jordan, a Salafist was chosen as head of the old-guard opposition group, the Muslim Brotherhood. In Kuwait, Salafists were elected to parliament and are leading the resistance to any change they believe threatens traditional Islamic values.

The gains for Salafists are part of a trend of turning back to conservatism and religion after nationalism and democratic reform failed to fulfill promises to improve people's lives. Egypt has been at the forefront of change in both directions, toward liberalization in the 1950s and '60s and back to conservatism more recently.

The growth of Salafism is visible in dress. In many parts of Cairo women wear the "niqab," a veil which shows at most the eyes rather than the "hijab" scarf that merely covers the hair. The men grow their beards long and often shave off mustaches, a style said to imitate the Prophet Muhammad.

The word "salafi" in Arabic means "ancestor," harking back to a supposedly purer form of Islam said to have been practiced by Muhammad and his companions in the 7th century. Salafism preaches strict segregation of the sexes and resists any innovation in religion or adoption of Western ways seen as immoral.

"When you are filled with stress and uncertainty, black and white is very good, it's very easy to manage," said Selma Cook, an Australian convert to Islam who for more than a decade described herself as a Salafi.

"They want to make sure everything is authentic," said Cook, who has moved away from Salafist thought but still works for Hoda, a Cairo-based Salafi satellite channel.

In most of the region, Salafism has been a purely social movement calling for an ultraconservative lifestyle. Most Salafis shun politics — in fact, many argue that Islamic parties like the Muslim Brotherhood and the Palestinians' Hamas are too willing to compromise their religion for political gain.

Its preachers often glorify martyrdom and jihad — or holy war — but always with the caveat that Muslims should not launch jihad until their leaders call for it. The idea is that the decision to overturn the political order is up to God, not the average citizen.

But critics warn that Salafis could easily slide into violence. In North Africa, some already have — the Algerian Salafi Group for Call and Combat has allied itself with al-Qaida and is blamed for bombings and other attacks. Small pockets of Salafis in northern Lebanon and Gaza have also taken up weapons and formed jihadi-style groups.

"I am afraid that this Salafism may be transferred to be a jihadi Salafism, especially with the current hard socio-economic conditions in Egypt," says Khalil El-Anani, a visiting scholar at Washington's Brookings Institution.

The Salafi way contrasts with the Islam long practiced in Egypt. Here the population is religious but with a relatively liberal slant. Traditionally, Egyptian men and women mix rather freely and Islamic doctrine has been influenced by local, traditional practices and an easygoing attitude to moral foibles.

But Salafism has proved highly adaptable, appealing to Egypt's wealthy businessmen, the middle class and even the urban poor — cutting across class in an otherwise rigidly hierarchical society.

In Cairo's wealthy enclaves of Maadi and Nasr City, robed, upper-class Salafis drive BMWs to their engineering firms, while their wives stay inside large homes surrounded by servants and children.

Sara Soliman and her businessman husband, Ahmed el-Shafei, both received the best education Egypt had to offer, first at a German-run school, then at the elite American University in Cairo. But they have now chosen the Salafi path.

"We were losing our identity. Our identity is Islamic," 27-year-old Soliman said from behind an all-covering black niqab as she sat with her husband in a Maadi restaurant.

"In our (social) class, none of us are brought up to be strongly practicing," added el-Shafei, also 27, in American-accented English, a legacy of a U.S. boyhood. Now, he and his wife said, they live Islam as "a whole way of life," rather than just a set of obligations such as daily prayers and fasting during the holy month of Ramadan.

A dozen satellite TV channels, most Saudi-funded, are perhaps Salafism's most effective vehicle. They feature conservative preachers, call-in advice shows and discussion programs on proper Islamic behavior.

Cairo's many Salafist mosques are packed on Fridays. Outside Shaeriyah mosque, a bookstall featured dozens of cassettes by Mohammed Hasaan, a prolific conservative preacher who sermonizes on the necessity of jihad and the injustices inflicted on Muslims.

Alongside the cassettes, a book titled "The Sinful Behaviors of Women" displayed lipstick, playing cards, perfumes and cell phones on the cover. Another was titled "The Excesses of American Hubris."

Critics of Salafism say it has spread so quickly in part because the Egyptian and Saudi governments encouraged it as an apolitical, nonviolent alternative to hard-line jihadi groups.

These critics warn that the governments are playing with fire — that Salafism creates an environment that breeds extremism. Al-Qaida continues to try to draw Salafists into jihad, and its No. 2, the Egyptian Ayman al-Zawahri, praised Salafists in an Internet statement in April, urging them to take up arms.

"The Salafi line is not that jihad is not a good thing, it is just not a good thing right now," said Richard Gauvain, a lecturer in comparative religion at the American University in Cairo.

The Salafis' talk of eventual jihad focuses on fighting Americans in Afghanistan and Iraq, not on overthrowing pro-U.S. Arab governments denounced by al-Qaida. Most Salafi clerics preach loyalty to their countries' rulers and some sharply denounce al-Qaida.

Egypt, with Saudi help, sought to rehabilitate jailed Islamic militants, in part by providing them with Salafi books. Critics say President Hosni Mubarak's government sees the Salafists as a counterweight to the opposition Muslim Brotherhood.

The political quietism of the Salafis and their injunctions to always obey the ruler are too good an opportunity for established Arab rulers to pass up, said novelist Alaa Aswani, one of the most prominent critics of rising conservatism in Egypt.

"That was a kind of Christmas present for the dictators because now they can rule with both the army and the religion," he said.

The new wave of conservatism is not inevitable, Aswani maintains, noting that his books — including his most popular, "The Yacoubian Building" — have risque themes and condemnations of conservatives, and yet are best-sellers in Egypt.

"The battle is not over, because Egypt is too big to be fitting in this very, very little, very small vision of a religion," he said.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081019/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_egypt_rising_salafis



Some Acts from Sunnah for Discussion

A few issues that I'd like to open for discussion here:

1) Growing the beard

As we know, shaving the beard is haram according to the majority of scholars, including the 4 Imaams. (Refer to the article Shaving the Beard: A Modern Effeminacy by Shaykh Muhammad al-Jibaly.)

There's khilaf (disagreement) among scholars regarding cutting the beard:
  • The beard should be left to grow naturally, without cutting it at all. (I.e. not even a little) As far as I know, this is the view of Imam an-Nawawi & Shaykh Bin Baz. (I'm not sure about Shaykh Uthaymeen and I shall not generalize this view to all the Saudi scholars.)
  • The beard should be left to grow naturally. However, one can trim his beard to make it neat and tidy. This is the view of Imam Malik, Imam al-Shafi'i (if I'm not mistaken), and Imam al-Ghazali.
  • One should cut his beard what exceeds a handful. This is in following the action of Ibn 'Umar radiyAllahu 'anhuma. This is the view of Shyakh al-Albani. The Hanafees view it as wajib.
Discussion points:
  • Does anyone know the view of Imam Ibn Hajar?
  • What if a person cuts less than a handful? What's the ruling? What if it was done to tidy it and make it neat?
  • Imam an-Nawawi views that one shouldn't cut his beard at all. In S'pore, I only see Ustaz Ghouse Khan having a thick and long beard. Where are the Shafi'ees? Hehe.. I don't even see many ustazs following the example of Ibn 'Umar at the very least.. many tend to keep short, short goatees.. Subhanallah..

2) To trim or to shave the moustache?

The Sunnah is to trim the moustache. This is as stated by the Lajnah, as can be read from Fatwa-Online. There's nothing wrong in shaving the moustache.

In a previous entry, I posted a link to an answer in Islam-qa. I quote:

Al-Tabari and al-Qaadi ‘Iyaad favoured the view that both are permissible: shaving and trimming; al-Haafiz Ibn Hajar also inclined towards this view in Fath al-Baari (10/347).

See: al-Mawsoo’ah al-Fiqhiyyah (25/320).

Imam an-Nawawi views that the moustache is to be trimmed from the edges, making the upper lip visible. Imam Ibn Hajar views that the moustache should be trimmed excessively. (I think that means very thin. What I've read, the argument is that Ibn 'Umar used to trim his moustache excessively such that it appeared as though he shaved it.)

In an article that I received through email, our brothers in Egypt prefer shaving the moustache. I quote:

The growth of Salafism is visible in dress. In many parts of Cairo women wear the "niqab," a veil which shows at most the eyes rather than the "hijab" scarf that merely covers the hair. The men grow their beards long and often shave off mustaches, a style said to imitate the Prophet Muhammad.

But I've also read that Imam Malik viewed shaving the moustache as bid'ah. Hmm..

Discussion point:
Flexibility and respect for the difference of opinions, that's my stance. So I'd agree with Imam al-Tabari, al-Qaadi 'Iyyaad and Imam Ibn Hajar that both (shaving and trimming the moustache) are permissible. Thus, it's a matter of choice.


3) Placing the Hands in Prayer

As we've understood from the Sunnah (especially from Shaykh al-Albani's book Sifat Salatun-Nabi), the Sunnah is to place the right hand over the back of the left palm, wrist and lower arm. And the hands should be placed upon the chest.

Discussion points:
  • placing the right hand over the left or grasping the wrist? To me, it's a matter of choice. It'd be better to practice the first option sometimes, and to practice the other option at other times, in closer following of the Prophet's actions.
  • ultimately upon the chest (such that the hands are quite close to the throat) or below the breast? I'd prefer below the breast (still upon the chest, as chest is above the level of the elbows).
By doing so, we won't appear too different from the common people. As far as I know, below the breast is practiced by Imam Ibn Khuzaymah (see Sifat Salatun-Nabi), Imam Ahmad and Imam al-Shafi'i. [So I wonder where the opinion of putting the hands just above the navel (covering it a little) and a little to the left comes from...]


4) Moving the Index Finger in Tashahhud

Yes, this is the Sunnah, as explained by Shaykh al-Albani in his book.

Shaykh Muqbil ibn Hadi al-Wadi'ee on the hand, views that the index finger should be pointing straight, without moving it. [Pointing from beginning till end.]

Both opinions are debatable, from what I know. Hence, I'd like to quote from Shaykh 'Abdurrazaq 'Afeefee who said that "While it is better to move (index finger), both are from the Sunnah."

In al-Majmoo', Imam an-Nawawi's view is the same as Shaykh Muqbil's. And it can be said that this view is the stronger view in the Shafi'i madhhab.

Discussion: should we insist on moving the index finger?

If you ask me, I'd see the situation. If I'm on my own or among people familiar with this Sunnah, I'd move my index finger. However, if I'm with the common people, I'd only point it so as not to appear too different from them, as well as to teach them the stronger opinion from the Shafi'i madhhab.

Additional note:
Our brother and dear friend Khairul Anwar related to me that he prayed beside Shaykh 'Ubayd al-Jaabiree hafizahullaah.. the Shaykh is very calm and "relaxed" in his prayer.. the Shaykh wasn't tensed during his standing in prayer (unlike some shadeed brothers who usually get tensed in prayer, placing the hands very high upon the chest)..

The Shaykh placed his hands upon his chest/below his breast (I can't recall exactly what was related to me.. what I recall is about the Shaykh being very "relaxed" during the standing, "relaxed" in placing of his hands upon his chest) and the Shaykh only point his index finger in Tashahhud, without moving it..

So I'd advise our shadeed brothers not to be too rigid in this matter.. especially those who are quick to comment or even denounce others who "seem to differ" from the Sunnah..


5) Isbaal

Brothers usually are aware of this matter, that it is haram from the garment (especially the lower garment) to cover the ankles.

But is it really necessary to shorten the trousers and the robe such that it reaches mid-calf?

I agree with the answer in Islam-qa that what is required to reach mid-calf is the 'izaar (loin cloth). Whereas for the trousers and robe, it's sufficient for it to be above the ankles.

Although to me it's kinda harsh/strict that the answer states that the trousers/robe shoudn't touch the ankles at all.

From my understanding, as long as it doesn't go beyond the ankles and covering them, it is perfectly fine


Wa billaahi at-Tawfeeq,
Wallaahu a'lam

Kuch Kuch HOTA Hai!

Don't ask me what the title means.. I truly don't know.. I just thought it would make a catchy title, hehe..

Wanna talk about HOTA.. hmm.. So HOTA is now automatic for all Muslims in Singapore.. if we disagree, we should opt out.. right? Hmm..

Yes, Muis did publish pamphletes about the permissibility of organ donation.. BUT... It doesn't fully truly address our situation..

As far as I know, donation of an organ (usually the issue involves kidney) becomes permissible out of necessity.. thus, the "supply" (organs donated) should only meet the "demand"...

But when everyone becomes automatic donors (upon their death), wouldn't the "supply" exceed the "demand"? Thus, wouldn't it result in a different ruling?

In the midst of the "debate" on the ruling of organ tansplant/donation some time back, a friend shared with me that the mashayikh in Saudi view that it should be a case to case basis.. that is, if there's a need to an organ donation/transplant, bring this up to the mashayikh and they'll advise on what should be done..

It's just disappointing we don't see it happening in S'pore.. I don't mean to insult or belittle anyone.. but the credibility of the Office of Mufti is just questionable to me.. the way they answer questions online are just "amazing"..

Just one example.. they insist that keeping of beard is only Sunnah (optional) according to the Shafi'i madhhab, despite the fact that I mention to them that Imam al-Shafi'i stated clearly in al-'Umm that it is haram to shave the beard..

Wa billaahi at-Tawfeeq wa al-Hidaayah,
Wallaahu a'lam

Tuesday, November 04, 2008

I hate trimming my beard!

Being in the Army, i've no choice but to trim my beard..

Some people might say, "At least you get to keep your beard.." While that is true, there's more to the issue than what meets the eye..

1) I applied for Muis support letter to keep the beard online (through Muis website). It's computer-generated (Muis is actually lazy to entertain "trivial matters"), and one has to choose from 3 options:
  • I am a Shafi'i and it is encouraged to keep the beard
  • I am a Shafi'i and I have made a vow to keep the beard
  • I am a Hanafi
I was like, "Huh???" I was reminded that when I asked Muis about the beard several years ago, the reply that I received from them states that keeping the beard is only optional (sunnah) according to the Shafi'i madhhab.

They must be kidding right? But that was their reply. Despite the fact that I clearly stated in my question that Imam al-Shafi'i rahimahullah stated in al-Umm that it is haram to shave the beard.

I've also read somewhere that Imam al-Nawawi rahimahullah viewed the beard should be left to grow naturally, should not be cut at all, not even a little. (Imagine that.. one shouldn't cut his beard at all..) I follow the view that one can trim his beard to keep it neat and tidy.. in fact, one can trim up to a fist length, following the action of Ibn 'Umar radiyAllahu 'anhuma and some of the Salaf.

'Ala kulli hal, the four madhhabs agree that it is haram to shave. [Refer to the article by Shaykh Muhammad al-Jibalee on "Shaving the Beard: A Modern Effiminacy".]

Upon the advice of Ustaz Hamzah, I chose the 2nd option. The letter was sent for processing and it turned out that my request to keep the beard is supported. [For some reason, I have the feeling that if one were to choose the 1st option, he won't get the approval.] [I didn't make a vow.. rather, I "interpret" it as a "vow"(conviction/strong determination) to adhere to the Sunnah of the Messenger.]

[Guess what? There's a trainee in my camp who keeps the beard too.. in fact, his request was approved concurrently with mine.. and he actually is a Shi'ite.. guess he knows how to go around things..]


2) In Muis letter, it is stated I've made a vow to keep the beard. Thus, the letter serves as a request to allow me to keep it. But it also states that I should keep my beard short and neat.

I was like "huh????" The Sunnah is to keep the beard long and thick! At most, keep it at fist-length.. thus, that's why the approval letter from the army requires me to keep my beard short.. haiz..


3) I've trimmed my beard before.. but merely to tidy it from unsightly "sproutings".. but never this short.. one thing about trimming the beard.. once u start trimming it, u'll feel that it's not tidy enough that u'll be trimming and trimming until Allah knows when.. and somehow u feel it's tidy/neat enough.. and then you realise that "gosh! now my beard is really short...."

Not forgetting the fact that since I've to keep it short throughout my 2 yrs in Army, imagine the number of times i'll be trimming my beard..

I fear that I'll get used to this habit such that I'll feel very comfortable with it and forget the main purpose of growing the beard long and thick....


Wallahu al-Musta'an

Saturday, November 01, 2008

The ruling concerning Drawings on the Prayer Carpets

Question:

Is it a condition regarding the prayer carpet that it carries religious pictures, like a picture of the two sacred Masjids (in Makkah and Al-Madinah) or a picture of some other Masjids or Qur'anic verses, etc? What is your opinion concerning the pictures that are on the width of the prayer carpet and not its length? what is the Islamic ruling regarding the permissibility or impermissibility of praying on carpets that have pictures of animals or birds and other similar things?
Answer:

It is not permissible for drawings of Qur'anic verses or animals or birds to be made on the carpets that are used for prayer. This is due to what writing Qur'anic Verses on prayer carpets contains of disrespect of the Qur'an. Also, making pictures of things that have souls (i.e.,animate beings) is not permissible. It is not a condition that prayer carpets must carry religious pictures, like pictures of the two sacred Masjids or a picture of some other Masjids. Rather, this is disliked, because looking at it will distract the person who is offering prayer and this weakens the person's devotion and humility in the prayer, which is required by the Islamic law. Indeed, Allah praised those who exhibit humility and devotion (Khushu') when he said:

"Verily, the believers are successful. They are those who are humble in their prayer....." (Al-Mu'minun 23:1-2)

May Allah send blessings and peace upon our prophet Muhammad.

Permanent Committee for Research and Verdicts

Fatawa Islamiyah, Vol.3, p.g 38,39, DARUSSALAM.

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Should two khutbahs be given on Eid or only one?

What is the correct view concerning the Eid khutbah – should it be one khutbah or two? What is the evidence for that?

Praise be to Allaah.

The majority of scholars, of the four madhhabs and others, are of the view that two khutbahs should be given on Eid, and the imam should sit briefly between them, as is done in the Jumu’ah (Friday) khutbah.

It says in al-Mudawwanah 1/231: Maalik said: In all khutbahs – the khutbah of the imam when praying for rain (istisqa’), the two Eids, the day of ‘Arafah and on Fridays – the imam should separate between the two khutbahs by sitting briefly. End quote.

Al-Shaafa’i (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in al-Umm (1/272): It was narrated that ‘Ubayd-Allaah ibn ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Utbah said: The Sunnah on Eid is for the imam to deliver two khutbahs, sitting briefly in between. Al-Shaafa’i said: that applies to the prayers for rain, the khutbah given during the eclipse prayer, the khutbah of Hajj, and every khutbah given to a congregation. End quote.

See Badaa’i’ al-Sanaa’i’, 1/276; al-Mughni, 2/121

Al-Shawkaani (may Allaah have mercy on him) said, commenting on the report quoted above: The second hadeeth makes it more likely to be correct when we draw an analogy with Jumu’ah. ‘Ubayd-Allaah ibn ‘Abd-Allaah is a Taabi’i, as is well known, so his saying, “It is Sunnah” cannot be taken as evidence that it is the Sunnah of the Prophet SAWS (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), as is stated in the usool. There is a marfoo’ hadeeth narrated by Ibn Maajah which speaks of sitting in between the two khutbahs of Eid, but its isnaad includes Isma’eel ibn Muslim, who is da’eef (weak). End quote from Nayl al-Awtaar, 3/323

The hadeeth of Ibn Maajah (1279) was narrated from Jaabir ibn ‘Abd-Allaah, who said: The Messenger of Allaah SAWS (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) came out on the day of Fitr or Adha and delivered a khutbah standing, then he sat for a while, then he stood up. This hadeeth was narrated by al-Albaani in Da’eef Ibn Maajah, where he said it is munkar.

It says in ‘Awn al-Ma’bood (4/4): al-Nawawi said in al-Khulaasah: the report narrated from Ibn Mas’ood, according to which he said, The Sunnah is for two khutbahs to be delivered on Eid, in between which the imam sits briefly, is da’eef and its isnaad is not uninterrupted. There is no proven report about giving more than one khutbah, and the evidence is analogy with Jumu’ah. End quote.

We may conclude from this the evidence which supports the idea of giving two khutbahs is as follows:

1 – The hadeeth of Ibn Maajah and the report of Ibn Mas’ood (may Allaah be pleased with him), both of which are da’eef, as stated above.

2 – The report of ‘Ubayd-Allaah ibn ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Utbah, who is a Taabi’i.

3 –Analogy with Jumu’ah

4 – Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah be pleased with him) mentioned a fourth thing that may be quoted as evidence. He (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: The phrase ‘two khutbahs’ reflects the view of the fuqaha’ (may Allaah have mercy on him), that there should be two khutbahs on Eid, because that was mentioned in a hadeeth narrated by Ibn Maajah with his isnaad, which requires further examination. The apparent meaning is that two khutbahs should be given, but whoever examines the Sunnah in agreed-upon reports in al-Saheehayn and elsewhere will see that the Prophet SAWS (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) only gave one khutbah, but after he had finished the first khutbah, he went to the women and exhorted them. If we take this as the basic principle concerning it being prescribed to give two khutbahs, then it is possible, although it is unlikely, because he went to the women and addressed them because they could not hear the khutbah. This is possible. And it may be possible that they could hear his words, but he wanted to address them specifically, hence he reminded them and exhorted them concerning matters that pertained specifically to them. End quote from al-Sharh al-Mumti’, 5/191.

The Standing Committee was asked: Should the imam sit between the two khutbahs of Eid?

They replied: The two khutbahs of Eid are Sunnah and come after the Eid prayer, because of the report narrated by al-Nasaa’i, Ibn Maajah and Abu Dawood, from ‘Abd-Allaah ibn al-Saa’ib (may Allaah be pleased with him) who said: I attended Eid prayer with the Prophet SAWS (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). When he had finished praying he said: “We will deliver a khutbah; whoever wishes to sit and listen to the khutbah, let him do so, and whoever wants to leave, let him do so.” Al-Shawkaani (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in al-Nayl: al-Musannif (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: This shows that the khutbah is Sunnah; it is were obligatory, it would be obligatory to sit and listen to it.

It is prescribed for the one who delivers two khutbahs on Eid to separate them by sitting briefly, by analogy with the two khutbahs of Jumu’ah, and because of the report narrated by al-Shaafa’i (may Allaah have mercy on him) from ‘Ubayd ibn ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Utbah (may Allaah have mercy on him) who said: The Sunnah is for the Imam to deliver two khutbahs on Eid, sitting briefly in between them.

Some scholars are of the view that there is only one khutbah for Eid prayer, because the saheeh ahaadeeth from the Messenger of Allaah SAWS (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) speak of only one khutbah. And Allaah knows best.

End quote from Fataawa Islamiyyah, 1/425

Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) was asked: Should the imam deliver one khutbah or two on Eid?

He replied: The well known view among the fuqaha’ (may Allaah have mercy on him) is that there should be two khutbahs on Eid, because of a da’eef hadeeth which was narrated concerning that, but in the hadeeth whose authenticity is agreed upon, it says that the Prophet SAWS (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) only delivered one khutbah. I hope that the matter is flexible. End quote.

Majmoo’ Fataawa al-Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen, 16/246

He also said (16/248):

The Sunnah is for there to be one khutbah, but if two khutbahs are given that is fine, because it was narrated that the Prophet SAWS (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) also did that. But the imam should not forget to exhort the women in particular, because the Prophet SAWS (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) did that.

If he is speaking via a microphone and the women can hear him, he should devote the end of his khutbah to exhorting the women in particular. If he is not using a microphone and the women cannot hear him, then he should go to them, accompanied by one or two other men, and say a few words to them. End quote.

In conclusion: This is a matter that is subject to ijtihaad, and it is flexible. There is no definitive text in the Sunnah concerning this matter, although it seems that it should be one khutbah. Let the imam do whatever he thinks is closest to the Sunnah.

And Allaah knows best.


Khutbah 'Ied dan Anjuran untuk Menghadirinya

Dari Abu Sa'id al-Khudri radhiyAllahu 'anhu, dia berkata:

"Nabi shallAllahu 'alaihi wa sallam biasa berangkat ke tempat shalat (tanah lapang) pada hari raya 'Iedul Fithri dan 'Iedul Adh-ha, maka yang pertama kali beliau lakukan adalah shalat, kemudia berbalik dan berdiri menghadap ke arah jama'ah shalat yang sedang dudk ada barisan mereka masing-masing, kemudian beliau memberikan nasihat, wasiat dan perintah kepada mereka." [1]

Khutbah 'Ied sama seperti khutbah-khutbah lainnya, yang diawali dengan pujian dan sanjungan kepada Allah 'Azza wa Jalla.

Ibnul Qayyim rahimahullah mengatakan: "Nabi shallAllahu 'alaihi wa sallam biasa membuka semua khutbahnya dengan pujian kepada Allah. Dan tidak pernah dihafal dari beliau satu hadits pun yang menyebutkan bahwa beliau membuka khutbah 'Iedul Fithri maupun 'Iedul Ahd-ha dengan takbir, adapun riwayat yang diriwayatkan oleh Ibnu Majah di dalam kitab Sunannya [2] dari Sa'ad al-Qurazh, mu'adzin Nabi shallAllahu 'alaihi wa sallam bahwasanya beliau banyak bertakbir di sela-sela khutbah serta memperbanyak takbir pada khutbah 'Iedul-Fithri dan 'Iedul Adh-ha, maka ini tidak menunjukkan bahwa beliau membuka khutbah dengna takbir tersebut." [3]

Dan tidak ada satu hadits pun yang diriwayatkan secara shahih yang menyebutkan bahwa khutbah 'Ied itu terdiri dari dua khutbah, yang dipisahkan antara keduanya dengan duduk.

Yang menyebutkan hal itu adalah hadits dha'if (lemah) sekali yang diriwayatkan oleh al-Bazzar di dalam Musnadnya (no. 53 - Musnad Sa'ad), dari Syaikhnya, 'Abdullah bin Syabib dengan sanadnya dari Sa'ad radhiyAllahu 'anhu bahwa Nabi shallAllahu 'alaihi wa sallam biasa berkhutbah dua kali, di antara keduanya dipisahkan dengan duduk.

Dan mengenai 'Abdullah bin Syabib ini, al-Bukhari mengatakan: "Haditsnya munkar."

Dengan demikian, khutbah itu pada dasarnya hanyalah satu kali saja.

Dan menghadiri khutbah ini tidak wajib, berbeda dengan shalat 'Ied (yang hukumnya wajib), yang demiian itu didasarkan pada apa yang diriwayatkan dari 'Abdullah bin as-Sa'ib, dia berkata: "Aku pernah menghadiri shalat 'Ied bersama Nabi shallAllahu 'alaihi wa sallam, dan ketika selesai shalat, beliau bersabda:

"Sesungguhnya kami akan berkhutbah, barangsiapa ingin duduk untuk mendengarkan khutbah, maka dipersilakan duduk. Dan barangsiapa yang ingin pergi, maka dipersilakan untuk pergi." " [4]

Ibnul Qayyim rahimahullah mengatakan[5]: "Nabi shallAllahu 'alaihi wa sallam memberikan keringanan bagi orang yang ikut menghadiri shalat 'Ied untuk duduk mendengarkan khutbah atau pergi (tidak mendengarkan khutbah)." [6]

[Diadaptasi dari kitab "Meneladani Rasulullah shallAllahu 'alaihi wa sallamdalam Berhari Raya" oleh Syaikh 'Ali Hasan bin 'ali al-Halabi al-Atsari, terbitan Pustaka Imam Asy-Syafi'i]


Ibn Shamsud-Deen:
"Kesimpulannya, dua perkara penting untuk diambil perhatian:

- Khutbah 'Ied adalah seperti khutbah-khutbah yang lain, dibuka dengan sanjungan dan pujian kepada Allah, bukan dengan takbir
- Yang shahih, khutbah 'Ied hanya sekali. Lalu bagaimana kalau dilakukan dua kali? Harap baca tulisan seterusnya.

Saturday, September 20, 2008

Mengapa saya tidak mengambil dari Yusuf al-Qaradawi


Dah lama sebenarnya nak sebut tentang perkara ini tetapi elakkan dulu. Nak bicara pun, tak perlu panjang-panjang, rasanya secara ringkas cukup..

1) Fiqhnya memang hebat. Itulah gambaran yang sering kita terima. Akan tetapi, bagi Talibul 'ilm, bila kita dah terdidik dengan ilmu-ilmu asas agama (terutama bagaimana para ulama menyimpulkan sesuatu hukum), nampak ketara kecacatan pada fiqh Dr Qaradawi. Ada kekurangan kalau nak dibandingkan dengan kupasan masyayikh.

2) Gabungkan fiqh dengan hadith. Inilah seruan Dr Yusuf al-Qaradawi, sebagaimana boleh dilihat dalam kitab "Manhaj Fiqh al-Qaradawi". (Sebenarnya telah diserukan terlebih dahulu oleh Syeikh al-Albani dan ulama sebelumnya.)

Akan tetapi, cakap tak serupa bikin. Keilmuan beliau tentang ilmu hadith tak ketara. Bahkan, beliau dengan mudah menghukum hadith-hadith tentang larangan alat-alat muzik sebagai dha'if dengan menukil dari Qadhi Ibnul Arabi dan Ibnu Hazm sedangkan kedua-dua imam tersebut bukanlah ahli hadith.

3) Dr al-Qaradawi seorang Salafi? Aqidahnya bagaimana?

Maaf ye, tapi bila sentuh tentang ini, terpaksalah komen sedikit tentang Dr Asri (mufti Perlis)..

Dr Asri jelas mengagumi Dr Qaradawi berserta tokoh-tokoh Ikhwanul Muslimin yang lain.. malah menganggap mereka sebagai tokoh-tokoh Islam masa kini.. malah, ada muridnya (di Youtube) yang menyifatkan Dr Qaradawi sebagai tokoh Salafi..

Benarkah demikian? Tak dinafikan Hasan al-Banna menyifatkan gerakan Ikhwan sebagai "Da'watus Salafiyyah" tetapi beliau juga sifatkan gerakan beliau sbg "haqiqatus sufiyyah"..

Sejak bila fahaman tasawwuf sejajar dengan manhaj Salaf?

Tidak lupa pula kepada pelbagai i'tiqad yang wujud dalam gerakan Ikhwan kerana latar belakang, manhaj dan fikrah yang berbeza pada para ahlinya.

Manhaj Salaf menyeru setiap Muslim bersatu atas al-Qur'an dan as-Sunnah berdasarkan pemahaman kaum Salafus-Salih.. apakah setiap anggota gerakan Ikhwan berfahaman demikian? Malah, mereka sebelum ini berusaha kpd taqrib dengan kaum Syi'ah, wa iyadzu billah..

Maka, kepada Dr Asri dan murid-muridnya, bezakanlah antara "da'wah Salaf" dengan "manhaj Salaf".. macam "pejuang Sunnah", dalam ibadah ikut Sunnah.. tapi manhajnya belum tentu manhaj Salaf..

Dan masalah manhaj ini boleh kita lihat pada Dr Qaradawi, yang tanpa ragu, bukan bermanhaj Salaf..

Belum lagi bab aqidah. Di dalam buku "70 Tahun Ikhwanul Muslimin", Dr Qaradawi menyebutkan bahawa Ahlus Sunnah itu sama ada Asy'ariyyah ataupun Maturidiyyah. Sedikit pun beliau tidak sebutkan tentang aqidah Salaf. Apakah beliau tidak tahu aqidah Asy'ariyyah ataupun Maturidiyyah tidak selari dengan Aqidah Salaf?

Lalu bagaimana saya ingin mengambil daripada Dr Qaradawi?

Apa yang baik pada Dr Qaradawi boleh saya dapati pada Masyayikh Salafi yang lebih berhak untuk diambil manfaat.. lalu saya tidak perlu kepada Dr Qaradawi..

Akhir sekali.. lihatlah janggutnya yang semakin pendek.. tak relevan? hmm.. kalau berjiwa Sunnah dan ingin menghidupkan Sunnah, kena simpan janggut yg lebat (sebelum ini janggut beliau memang lebat).. kalau nak potong pun, potong yang lebih dari segenggam.. tapi bagi beliau, dah terlalu pendek..

Wallahu a'lam

PS. Harap rujuk kepada tulisan Masyayikh tentang manhaj dan juga tentang Dr Al-Qaradawi untuk ulasan yang lebih terperinci.

Friday, September 19, 2008

The dhikr that is prescribed when breaking the fast

What is the ruling on the du’aa’ from hadeeth which they say are da’eef (weak), such as:
1 – Saying when breaking the fast: “Allaahumma laka sumtu wa ‘ala rizqika aftartu (O Allaah, for You I have fasted and by Your provision I have broken the fast).”
2 – Ashhadu an laa ilaaha ill-Allaah astaghfir Allaah as’aluka al-jannah wa a’oodhu bika min al-naar (I bear witness that there is no god but Allaah, I ask Allaah for forgiveness, I ask You for Paradise and I seek refuge with You from the Fire).
Is this prescribed, permissible, not permissible, makrooh, not valid or haraam?.

Praise be to Allaah.

Firstly:

Saying du’aa’ in the words mentioned when breaking the fast was narrated in a da’eef (weak) hadeeth which was narrated by Abu Dawood (2358) from Mu’aadh ibn Zuhrah, who heard that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) used to say, when he broke his fast, “Allaahumma laka sumtu was ‘ala rizqika aftartu (O Allaah, for You I have fasted and by Your provision I have broken the fast).”

There is no need for this, because we have the report narrated by Abu Dawood (2357) from Ibn ‘Umar (may Allaah be pleased with him) who said: When the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) broke his fast, he would say: “Dhahaba al-zamau’a, wa abtallat al-‘urooq wa thabata al-ajr insha Allah (Thirst has gone, the veins are moist, and the reward is assured, if Allaah wills).” This hadeeth was classed as hasan by al-Albaani in Saheeh Abi Dawood.

Secondly:

It is mustahabb for the fasting person to say du’aa’ whilst he is fasting and when breaking the fast, because of the report narrated by Ahmad (8030) from Abu Hurayrah (may Allaah be pleased with him) who said: We said: O Messenger of Allaah, when we see you our hearts are softened and we are people of the Hereafter, but when we leave you we are attracted by this world and by our womenfolk and children. He said: “If you were always as you are when you are with me, the angels would shake hands with you and they would visit you in your houses. If you did not commit sin, Allaah would bring another people who would commit sin so that He could forgive them.” He said: We said: O Messenger of Allaah, tell us about Paradise, what is it built of? He said: “Bricks of gold and bricks of silver; its mortar is musk, its pebbles are pearls and rubies, its soil is saffron. Whoever enters it will be happy and will never be miserable, he will abide therein forever and never die. His clothes will never wear out and his youth will never fade. There are three whose du’aa’ will not be rejected: a just ruler, a fasting person until he breaks the fast, and the prayer of one who has been wronged. It is borne on the clouds and the gates of heaven are opened for it, and the Lord, may He be glorified and exalted, says: ‘By My glory, I will grant you help even if it is after some time.’”

This hadeeth was classed as saheeh by Shu’ayb al-Arna’oot in Tahqeeq al-Musnad.

It was also narrated by al-Tirmidhi (2525) with the words, “… the fasting person when he breaks his fast…” This was classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh al-Tirmidhi.

So you may ask Allaah for Paradise and seek refuge with Him from the Fire, and you can pray for forgiveness, and offer other du’aa’s that are prescribed in Islam. As for the du’aa’ in this particular form – Ashhadu an laa ilaaha ill-Allaah astaghfir Allaah as’aluka al-jannah wa a’oodhu bika min al-naar (I bear witness that there is no god but Allaah, I ask Allaah for forgiveness, I ask You for Paradise and I seek refuge with You from the Fire) – we could not find any source for it.

And Allaah knows best.


Islam Q&A


http://www.islam-qa.com/en/ref/93066

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Which were the First Schools of Jurisprudence

Author: Al Imaam 'Alee al Madeenee

Topic: Did you know

Reference: 'Ilm ar Rijaal P.289 - more about reference here...


‘Alee al Madeenee stated:

There were none amongst the companions of the Messenger of Allaah - صلى الله عليه وسلم- whom people used to follow their Madhab /opinions, relate their verdicts and follow their way except three:

‘Abdullaah ibn Mas’ood

Zayd ibn Thaabit

‘Abdullaah ibn ‘Abbaas

He also stated:

There were none amongst the companions of the Messenger of Allaah who had companions that used to relate and act upon their verdicts except three:

‘Abdullaah ibn Mas’ood

Zayd ibn Thaabit

‘Abdullaah ibn ‘Abbaas



http://www.subulassalaam.com/articles/article.cfm?article_id=11

Who the Most Knowledgeable Companions Were

Author: Al Imaam 'Alee al Madeenee

Topic: Did you know

Reference: 'Ilm ar-Rijaal: P. 287 - more about reference here...



‘Alee al Madeenee stated:

"Masrooq said: ' I studied the companions of the Messenger, صلى الله عليه وسلم,and found that their knowledge ended with six individuals;

'Umar ibn al Khataab

'Alee ibn Abee Taalib

‘Abdullaah ibn Mas’ood

Abu ad Dardaa

Ubay ibn Ka'b and

Zayd ibn Thaabit.

I further studied these six and found that their knowledge ended with two of them; 'Alee and 'Abdullaah.[1]

Al Khateeb al Baghdadee narrated upon the authority of Masrooq ibn al Ajda' al Hamdanee who said:

"The scholars after their Prophet, صلى الله عليه وسلم, were six, those who used to give verdicts that people acted upon, determine the amount of wealth to be inherited, practice Sunan that were acted upon, they were:

'Umar ibn al Khataab

'Alee ibn Abee Taalib

'Abdullaah ibn Mas'ood

Ubay ibn Ka'b

Zayd ibn Thaabit

Abu Musa al Ash'aree

He then said:

"Of these six, three were in al Kufah; 'Alee, 'Abdullaah and Abu Musa, the other three were spread out."

'Alee al Madeenee also narrated on the authority of Masrooq who said:

"I studied the companions of the Messenger, صلى الله عليه وسلم, they were like al Akhaadh, amongst them were those who narrated to one person, amongst them were those who narrated to two and three, amongst them were those who narrated to everybody [i.e. everybody took narrations from them].

'Abdullaah ibn Mas'ood was amongst those who narrated to everybody.”


http://www.subulassalaam.com/articles/article.cfm?article_id=5