Thursday, August 31, 2006

The Ruling on Isbal Without Conceit, and if one is Forced to do it



The Ruling on Isbal Without Conceit, and if one is Forced to do it

Question:

What is the ruling for letting the garment fall below the ankles out of arrogance or without arrogance? What if one is forced to this by one's family or by custom?

Answer:

The ruling is that it is unlawful in the case of a man due to the saying of the Prophet (sallAllaahu `alayhi wa sallam):

ما أسفل من الكعبين من الإزار ففي النار

"Whatever is below the ankles of the Izar is in the Fire." (Al-Bukhari no. 5787)

And in his Sahih, Muslim recorded that Abu Tharr, may Allaah be pleased with him, said that Allaah's Messenger (sallAllaahu `alayhi wa sallam) said:

ثلاثة لا يكلمهم الله يوم القيامة ولا ينظر إليهم ولا يزكيهم ولهم عذاب أليم قال فقرأها رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم ثلاث مرار قال أبو ذر خابوا وخسروا من هم يا رسول الله قال المسبل والمنان والمنفق سلعته بالحلف الكاذب

"There are three people that Allaah will not speak to on the Day of Judgement, will not look at them, will not purify them; and for them is a painful punishment: one who lets his Izar hang below his ankles, the Mannan with what he gives, and the Munffiq who does his business with false oaths." (Muslim no. 106)

These are two Hadeeths, and their meanings are general, applying to one who drags the garment out of arrogance as well as the one who does it without arrogance. This is because the Prophet (sallAllaahu `alayhi wa sallam) stated it in a general manner without qualification. When the Isbal is done with arrogance then it results in a sin greater and a threat more severe, due to his (sallAllaahu `alayhi wa sallam) saying:

من جر ثوبه من الخيلاء لم ينظر الله إليه يوم القيامة

"Whoever drags his garment out of conceit, Allaah will not look at him on the Day of judgement." (Al-Bukhari no. 5784 and Muslim no. 2085)

It is not possible to think that the prohibition is limited to someone who does it out of arrogance, because the Messenger (sallAllaahu `alayhi wa sallam) didn't qualify the prohibition in the previous two Hadeeth.

He (sallAllaahu `alayhi wa sallam) also did not restrict that in another Hadeeth, where he (sallAllaahu `alayhi wa sallam) said to some of his Companions:

إياك وإسبال الإزار فإنها من المخيلة

"Beware of Isbal, for it is from conceit." (Abu Dawud no. 4084)

So he made all cases of Isbal arrogance, because it is normally not done without that. As for one who does not do it for that reason, then it is a means that leads to that. And a "means" holds the same ruling as an "end."

Furthermore, this is a form of waste, and letting one's garment drag on the ground makes that garment susceptible to impurities on the ground. This is why, when 'Umar, may Allaah be pleased with him, saw a young man letting his garment touch the ground, he said, "Raise your garment, for it is more pious to your Lord and cleaner for your garment."

As for the case when Abu Bakr As-Siddiq, may Allaah be pleased with him, said: "O Messenger of Allaah! "My Izar falls unless I take care (to hold it up)." The Prophet (sallAllaahu `alayhi wa sallam) said to him:

لست ممن يصنعه خيلاء

"You are not one of those who do so out of conceit." (Al-Bukhari no. 5784 and Abu Dawud no. 4085)

So his (sallAllaahu `alayhi wa sallam) point is that whoever tries to raise his garment when it is loose, then he is not dragging his garment out of arrogance, he merely cannot prevent it. It is just because it is hanging down while he takes care to raise it. So there is no doubt that this is a valid excuse. As for one who purposefully lets it hang, be it a Bushta, pants, Izar, shirt, then this falls under the threat, and he is not excused from dragging his garment. This is because the authentic Hadeeths that prohibit Isbal are general in wording, meaning, and objective. So it is obligatory for every Muslim (male) to beware of Isbal and to have Taqwa of Allaah in this matter, not allowing his garments to hang below his ankles in accordance with the authentic Hadeeths that warn him of Allaah's anger and punishment.

And with Allaah is the facilitation to do what is right.


Shaykh `Abdul-`Azeez Bin Baz

Fatawa Islamiyah, Vol. 7, Pages 373-375, DARUSSALAM


[taken from: http://www.fatwaislam.com/fis/index.cfm?scn=fd&ID=311]


Related links:

The Ruling Concerning Al-Isbal in Clothing
http://www.fatwaislam.com/fis/index.cfm?scn=fd&ID=307

The Lowest Allowable Point for a Garment
http://www.fatwaislam.com/fis/index.cfm?scn=fd&ID=308

The Ruling on Dragging one's Lower Garment out of Custom, Not Arrogance
http://www.fatwaislam.com/fis/index.cfm?scn=fd&ID=309

The Ruling on Dragging the Garments without Conceit
http://www.fatwaislam.com/fis/index.cfm?scn=fd&ID=310

Does Isbal Apply to Sleeves?
http://www.fatwaislam.com/fis/index.cfm?scn=fd&ID=313

Monday, August 28, 2006

Isbal: Kesalahan yang diremehkan pada masa kini



Isbal.....
Oleh Cyber Muslim Salafy
Fiqih 10/19/2001



Isbal karena sombong merupakan dosa

Allah berfirman:

"Dan janganlah kamu berjalan di muka bumi ini dengan sombong, karena sesungguhnya kamu sekalian tidak dapat menembus bumi dan sekali-kali kamu tidak akan setinggi gunung". (Al-Isra')

"Sesungguhnya Allah tidak menyukai orang-orang yang sombong lagi membanggakan diri". (Luqman: 18)

Rasulullah bersabda:

"Sesungguhnya orang yang menjulurkan pakaiannya (sampai menutupi mata kaki) karena sombong, maka Allah tidak akan memandangnya pada hari kiamat". (Muttafaq 'alaih, dari Ibnu Umar)

"Siapa yang menjulurkan (memanjangkan) kainnya karena sombong, maka Allah tidak akan memandangnya (pada hari kiamat)" (Hadits shahih riwayat Ahmad, Abu Dawud dari hadits Abu Sa'id).

Dari Abu Dzar, ia berkata: Rasulullah bersabda:

"Ada tiga (golongan manusia) yang tidak diajak bicara oleh Allah pada hari kiamat, tidak dipuji dan akan mendapat siksaan yang pedih (yaitu): Orang yang memanjangkan (isbal) kainnya, tukang ungkit (apa yang telah diberikan) yakni orang yang setiap kali memberi sesuatu kemudian mengungkit-ungkitnya dan orang yang menawarkan barang dagangannya dengan sumpah palsu". (Hadits shahih, oleh Muslim, Ahmad, Ashabu as-Sunan, dll.)


Isbal bukan karena sombong

Pertama: Ancaman neraka bagi orang yang musbil, sekalipun bukan karena sombong,

1. Hadits dari Ibnu Abbas, riwayat marfu' (sampai kepada Nabi):

"Setiap kain yang melewati dua mata kaki, maka (mata kaki itu) di neraka" (Shahih al-Jami' no. 4532).

2. Dari Abu Hurairah, dari Nabi, beliau berkata:

"Kain yang (menutupi) sampai bawah mata kaki, maka (mata kaki itu) di neraka" (Hadits shahih oleh Bukhari).

3. Dari 'Aisyah, dari Nabi, beliau bersabda:

"Kain yang sampai menutupi bawah mata kaki, maka (mata kaki itu) di neraka (Hadits shahih oleh Ahmad).

Kedua: Perintah mengangkat (meninggikan/ memendekkan) kain:

Dari Amr bin Syarid, ia berkata: Rasulullahmelihat dari kejauhan seseorang yang menjulurkan kainnya (hingga menutupi mata kaki), kemudian beliau bersegera sambil berlari-lari kecil menuju kepadanya, lalu bersabda:

"Angkat (tinggikan)lah kainmu, dan takutlah kepada Allah". (Dikeluarkan oleh Ahmad serta lainnya. Dan hadits ini serta dengan persyaratan Bukhari - Muslim).

Hadits ini memperlihatkan betapa bersemangatnya Rasulullahketika hendak menegur seseorang yang musbil pakaiannya.

Menurut kaidah bahwa, pada asalnya perintah itu menunjukkan wajib, berdasarkan firman Allah :
"Maka hendaknya orang-orang yang menyalahi perintah-Nya takut akan ditimpa fitnah (kekafiran) atau ditimpa azab yang pedih". (an-Nur: 63).

Ketiga: Larangan isbal secara mutlak.

1. Dari Mughirah bin Syu'bah, ia mengatakan: Rasulullahbersabda:

"Wahai Sufyan bin Sahl, jangan musbil, sesungguhnya Allah tidak menyukai orang-orang yang musbil". (Hadits yang dihasankan syaikh al-Albani).

2. Dari Jabir Saliim, sesungguhnya Rasulullahbersabda kepadanya:

"...Hati-hatilah, jangan sekali-kali kamu menjulurkan kain (hingga menutupi mata kaki), karena sesungguhnya menjulurkan kain (hingga menutupi mata kaki) merupakan pangkal kesombongan yang tidak disukai Allah". (Silsilah hadits ash-Ashahihah no. 770).

Menurut kaidah bahwa pada asalnya suatu larangan menunjukkan pengharaman, berdasarkan sabda Rasulullah :

"Apabila aku perintahkan kamu dengan suatu perintah, maka datangi (patuhi)lah perintah itu semaksimal kamu mampu, dan apabila aku larang kamu terhadap sesuatu, maka jauhilah larangan itu".(Hadits Muttafaq 'alaih).

Keempat: Bahwa umat diperintahkan untuk beruswah (mengambil suri teladan Nabi)

Allah berfirman:

"Sesungguhnya telah ada pada diri Rasulullah itu suri teladan yang baik bagimu (yaitu) bagi orang yang mengharap (rahmat) Allah dan (kedatangan) hari kiamat". (Al-Ahzab: 21).

Dalam hal ini, Nabi sebagai manusia yang paling bertakwa dan sebagai insan pilihan, pakaiannya adalah setengah betis. (HR. Ahmad dan Tirmidzi sanadnya shahih).

Kelima: Bahwa memanjangkan pakaian hingga menutupi mata kaki merupakan pangkal dan jalan bagi terjadinya kesombongan. Padahal salah satu tujuan datangnya syari'at Islam adalah menutup setiap jalan menuju perkara-perkara haram. Segala cara/ sarana yang digunakan menuju perkara haram, kedudukan hukumnya sama dengan perkara haram itu sendiri.

Al-Hafizh Ibnu Hajar -Rahimahullah- dalam Fathul Bari mengatakan: "Sesungguhnya isbal pasti akan berbentuk menjulurkan pakaian (hingga menutup mata kaki), sedangkan menjulurkan pakaian pasti membawa konsekuensi pada kesombongan, sekalipun pelakunya tidak bermaksud sombong. Ini didukung dengan riwayat Ibnu Umar yang marfu' (terangkat sampai) kepada Nabi , bahwa beliau bersabda:

"...Hati-hatilah kamu, jangan sekali-kali kamu memanjangkan kain (hingga menutup mata kaki), sesungguhnya memanjangkan kain merupakan pangkal kesombongan" (Hadits shahih dalam Fathul Bari).


Isbal dalam Shalat

Dalam al-Qaul al-Mubin fi Akhtha' al-Mushallin, dapat disimpulkan bahwa shalatnya orang yang berisbal tetap sah, hanya saja ia berbuat kemaksiatan. Syaikh Bin Baz -Rahimahullah- berfatwa tentang sahnya shalat dibelakang imam yang musbil. Wallahu a'lam.


Bagaimana dengan kaos kaki

Memakai kaos kaki bukan termasuk isbal, sebab isbal ialah memanjangkan pakaian (celana, sarung, gamis) yang dipakai dari atas. Wallahu a'lam.


[Ditukil dari sebuah emel yang diterima. Sumber emel tidak dinyatakan. Mohon maaf ke atas sumber asal artikel ini.]

Saturday, August 26, 2006

Does the Sun revolve around the earth?


Fatawa Arkanul-Islam
(Islamic Verdicts o­n the Pillars of Islam)
Shaykh Muhammad ibn Saalih Al-Uthaymeen (Rahimahullah)
Pgs. 67-72


Question:
Does the Sun revolve around the earth?
Answer:
It is apparent from the Islamic evidences that they confirm that it is the sun which revolves around the earth, and by it's revolving the alternation of night and day takes place o­n the surface of the earth. It is not for us to exceed the apparent meanings of these evidences without some evidence stronger than that, which permits us to explain them differently from their apparent meaning. Among the proofs that the sun revolves around the earth in a manner which causes the alternation of the night and day are the following:

1.) Allah, the Most High says, that when Ibraheem (alayhee salaam), disputed with the o­ne who argued with him concerning his Lord:

"Verily, Allah brings the sun form the east; then bring it you from the west."
{Surah Al-Baqarah 2:258}


2.) He also tells us that Ibraheem (alayhee salaam) said:

"When he saw the sun rising up, he said: 'This is my lord. This is greater.' But when it set, he said: 'O my people! I am indeed free from all that you join as partners (in worship with Allah)."
{Surah Al-An'am 6:78}


So He described the settings as an attribute of the sun and not that the earth set upon it, for if it was the earth which revolved, He would have said: but when (the earth) set upon it.

3.) Allah the Most High says:

"And you might have seen, the sun, when it rose, declining to the right from their Cave, and when it set, turning away from them to the left."
{Surah Al-Kahf 18:17}


He has described the declining and turning away as descriptions of the Sun, and that is a proof that the movement was from the sun. If it was a description of the earth, He would have said: Their cave declined from it. Likewise, describing the sun as rising and setting proves that it is the Sun which revolves, even though the indication of the may be less than the indication in His Words:

"declining" & "turning away from them"

4.) Allah, the Most High says:

"And He it is Who has created the night and the day, and the sun, and the moon, each in an orbit floating." {Surah Al-Anbiya 21:33}

Ibn Abbas (radiallahu anhu) said: "They revolve in an orbit, like the turning of a mill. This was widely reported from him.

5.) Allah, the Most High says:

"He brings the night as a cover over the day, seeking it rapidly." {Surah Al-Ara'af 7:54}

He described the night as seeking the day, and the seeker rushes and overtakes, and it is well known that the night and the day follow the sun.

6. Allah, the Most High says:

"He has created the heavens and the earth with truth. He makes the night to go in the day and makes the day to go in the night. And He has subjected the sun and the moon. Each running (on a fixed course) for an appointed term. Verily, He is the All-Mighty, the Oft-Forgiving." {Surah Az-Zumar 39:5}

and His Words:

"He makes the night to go in the day"

that is, it turns around it, as a turban is wrapped around, which proves the revolving of the night and the day around the eart. If it were the earth which revolved around them, He would have said: He causes the earth to revolve around the night and day.

And in His words:

"the sun and the moon, each running (on a fixed course)."

It is clear from what precedes it that it is a proof that the sun and the moon move in a perceptible orbit, because subjecting something which moves to it's movement is more apparent than subjecting something stationary which does not move.

7.) Allah, the Most High say:

"By the sun and it's brightness. By the moon as it follows it (the sun)." {Surah Ash-Shaams 91:1-2}

and the meaning of:

"follows it"

is that 'it comes after it' and this is a proof of their moving and revolving around the earth, for if it were the earth which revolved around them, the moon would not be following the sun; rather it would sometimes be following it and sometimes it would be followed by it, because the sun is higher than it. And deduction from this Verse requires study and reflection.

8.) Allah, the Most High say:

"And the sun runs o­n it's fixed course for a term {appointed}. That is the Decree of the Almighty, the All-Knowing. And the moon, We have measured for it mansions {to traverse} till it returns like the old dried date stalk. It is not for the sun to overtake the moon, nor does the night outstrip the day. They all float, each in an orbit. {Surah Ya-Sin 36:38-40}

So, attributing the movement to the sun and describing it as a Decree from the Almighty, Most Wise proves that it is a real movement with a far-reaching Decree, since the consequence of it is the alternation of the night and day and the seasons.

The measure of the moon's mansions {i.e., stations} is a proof that it traverses them, for if it was the earth which revolves , the measuring of the mansions would be for the earth's movement around the moon and not for the moon's movement around it.

And negating the sun's ability to overtake the moon, and the night's ability to outstrip the day are evidence of the rushing movement o­n the part of the sun and the moon, and the night and the day.

9.) The Prophet (alayhee salatul wasalaam) said to Abu Tharr (radiallah anhu), when the sun had just set:

"Do you know where it goes?"

He said, "Allah and His Messener knows best." He (alayhee salatul wasalaam) said:

"Verily, it goes (i.e., travels) and it prostrates beneath the Throne and seeks permission to rise, and permission is granted to it. Then (a time will come when) it will be about to prostrate itself but its prostration will not be accepted, and it will ask permission to go o­n it's course but will not be permitted, but it will be ordered: Return from whence you came, and so it will rise in the West." ***


***{Reported by Bukhari in the Book of the Beginning of Creation, in the Chapter: Description of the Sun and the Moon (#3199), and by Muslim in the Book of Faith, in the Chapter: Explanation of the Time When Faith will not be accepted (#159).}

So and it is extremely clear from his words: Return from whence you came that it revolves around the earth and through it's revolving the sunrise and sunset occur.

10.) It is clear form the many Ahadith which attribute rising, setting, and declining form it's zenith to the sun, that it is the sun which does so and so and the earth.

There are most probably other proofs that are not present with me at the moment, but what I have mentioned is a sumamry of the subject, and it is sufficient for my purpose. And Allah is the Granter of success.
Credit to Akh Muhammad Zaki Bin Samsudi for emailing this extract to me. May Allah bless Him.
Personal note:
It might be difficult for some of us to accept the above statement as it seems to contradict Science.
However, since when did Science prove to be always true and never contradictory?
Not too long ago, a scientist (or a group of scientists) did a research which would question Einstein's theory of E = mc2.
Most recently, scientists around the world have agreed to no longer recognise Pluto as a planet, leaving only 8 planets in our Solar System.
And of course, Muslims as well as Christians can never accept Darwin's Theory of Evolution which claims that humans evolved from apes.
So readers, think carefully..
After all, we must realise that Allah is the Creator of this Universe. He Knows His creations best. And He has revealed this knowledge in the Qur'an, which serves as a guidance for the Muttaqeen, as mentioned in the verse:

ذَلِكَ الْكِتَابُ لاَ رَيْبَ فِيهِ هُدًى لِّلْمُتَّقِينَ
This is the Book (the Qur'ân), whereof there is no doubt, a guidance to those who are Al-Muttaqûn [the pious and righteous persons who fear Allâh much (abstain from all kinds of sins and evil deeds which He has forbidden) and love Allâh much (perform all kinds of good deeds which He has ordained)]. (Al-Baqarah 2:2)
And Allah Knows best.

Imam Muqbil bin Haadee Al-Waadi'ee


You are here: Al-Ibaanah.com» Biographies » 15th Century (Deceased)

Died 1422H: Imaam Muqbil bin Haadee Al-Waadi’ee

AUTHOR: Shaikh Muqbil bin Haadee Al-Waadi’ee (Autobiography)
SOURCE: Tarjamah Abee ‘Abdir-Rahmaan (pg. 16-29, with minor abridgement) [2nd Edition; 1999]
PRODUCED BY: Al-Ibaanah.com



I come from Waadi’ah, which is a place to the east of the city of Sa’adah from the valley of Dammaaj. My name is Muqbil bin Haadee bin Muqbil bin Qaa’idah al-Hamdaanee al-Waadi’ee al-Khallaalee, from the tribe of Aali Raashid. [1]
All praise due to Allaah, most of the people of Waadi’ah, who neighbor Sa’adah defend me and the Da’wah. Some of them wish to defend the Religion while others defend their tribal devotion. If it were not for Allaah first, then them, the enemies of the (Salafi) Da'wah, particularly the Shee’ah of Sa’adah, would not have left behind any signs or traces of us.
I will mention some examples of them for which I ask Allaah to reward them, one of which was when I faced severe opposition in the Haadee Mosque because I turned people away from the (Shiite) Da’wah there. So some men from Waadi’ah and others stood by me to the point that Allaah saved me through their hands. The Shiites desired to rule against me. This was at the time of Ibraaheem Al-Hamdee. And evil people amongst the Communists and Shiites raised their heads and imprisoned me for a period of eleven days during Ramadaan. About fifty of the youth from Waad’iah would come to visit me in prison during some of the nights, while another hundred and fifty of their men would also go to the prison caretakers during these nights, so much so that the caretakers got fed up and released me from jail, all praise be to Allaah.
Another example is that the enemies of the Da’wah would sometimes come to Dammaaj with their weapons, so the people of Dammaaj would drive them away and they would be forced to leave in humiliation.
Another example is during our journeys. When I would say: “We wish to travel”, they would compete with one other, may Allaah preserve them, to see who would accompany and guard me. So sometimes we would go out on some of our travels in about 15 cars!
During these days, the Da’wah was progressing in a superb manner because, all praise be to Allaah, I had grown older. Perhaps at this point I have reached about 62 years of age. So it was the calamities and the advice from those who love the Da’wah that drove me to have kindness and to not keep up with the enemies, who don’t have anything but insults and abuses.
Also, due to my teaching, writing and giving Da’wah, I was not able to find time to keep up with those enemies. So let them say what they want for my sins are many, and perhaps because of their slander, my sins will be lightened for me and instead fall upon their shoulders.
My Studies and Teachers:
I studied at school until I completed the school’s curriculum. Then a long time passed without me seeking knowledge since there was no one who would encourage me or assist me in seeking knowledge. And I used to love seeking knowledge. So I sought knowledge from the Al-Haadee Mosque but I was not assisted in that.
After some time, I left my homeland (of Yemen) and went to the sacred lands (Makkah/Madeenah) and Najd. I would listen to the speakers and be fascinated by their sermons. So I sought the advice of some of the speakers on what beneficial books I should buy? They advised me to get Saheeh Al-Bukhaaree, Buloogh al-Maraam, Riyaadh as-Saaliheen, and Fath-ul-Majeed, the explanation of Kitaab at-Tawheed. And they gave me copies of the textbooks from the Tawheed courses.
At that time, I used to work as a security guard in a building in Makkah, and so I would cling tightly to those books, and the material would stick to my head because what the people in our country did was the opposite of what was in these books, especially Fath-ul-Majeed. After some time had passed, I returned to my country and began to rebuke everything I saw that contradicted what was in those books, such as offering sacrifices to other than Allaah, building shrines over the graves, and calling unto the deceased. So news of this reached the Shiites and they began to censure what I was upon. One of them would say (the hadeeth): “Whoever changes his religion, then kill him.” Another one sent a letter to my relatives saying: “If you don’t prevent him, we will imprison him!” But after that, they agreed to let me enter the Haadee Mosque in order to study with them, so that they may (perhaps) remove the misconceptions that had clung to my heart.
So after that, I was admitted to study with them in the Haadee Mosque. The head of education there was the Judge Mutahhir Hanash. I studied the book Al-‘Aqd-uth-Thameen and ath-Thalaatheen Mas’alah, along with its explanation by Haabis. From the teachers that taught me there was Muhammad bin Hasan al-Mutamayyiz. One time we were discussing the subject of seeing Allaah in the Hereafter, so he began to mock and ridicule Ibn Khuzaimah and other Imaams of Ahlus-Sunnah, but I used to conceal my creed. Despite that, I was too weak to put my right hand over my left hand during prayer, and I would pray with my hands by my side. We studied the text of al-Azhaar up to the section on Marriage.
I also studied an explanation of the Laws of Inheritance from a large book that was above the standard level, but I did not benefit from it. So I saw that the assigned books were not beneficial, except for Grammar, since I studied the books al-Aajroomiyyah and Qatar an-Nadaa with them. Then I asked the Judge, Qaasim bin Yahyaa ash-Shuwayl, to teach me Buloogh al-Maraam. So we started it, but then we were disapproved of, so we left it.
So when I saw that the assigned study books were of a Shiite and Mu’tazlite nature, I agreed to only take from the books of Grammar. So I studied Qatar an-Nadaa several times under Isma’eel al-Hatbah, may Allaah have mercy on him, in the masjid that I would live in and he would pray in. And he would give us a lot of time and attention. One time, Muhammad bin Hooriyyah came to the masjid and I advised him to abandon astrology (tanjeem). So he advised the people there to kick me out of the study program, but they interceded on my behalf and he kept quiet.
Some of the Shiites would pass by me while I was studying Qatar an-Nadaa and say something with the meaning that education would not have any effect on me. But I would just remain silent and benefit from the books on Grammar. I did this until the revolution started in Yemen, when we left our country and settled in Najraan. There I studied with Abul-Husayn Majd-ud-Deen al-Mu’eed and benefited from him particularly in the Arabic Language. I stayed in Najraan for the length of two years. Then when I became sure that the war between the Republic party and the King’s party (in Yemen) was all for the sake of worldly reasons, I resolved to travel to the sacred lands (Makkah/Madeenah) and to Najd. I lived in Najd for one and a half months in a school for Qur’aanic memorization, which was run by Shaikh Muhammad bin Sinaan Al-Hadaa’ee. He was very hospitable to me because he saw that I benefited from the knowledge. And he advised me to stay for a while until he could send me to the Islamic University (of Madeenah). But the environment in Riyaadh changed for me and I decided to travel to Makkah.
I used to work whenever I found work, and I would seek knowledge at night, attending the lessons of Shaikh Yahyaa bin ‘Uthmaan al-Paakistaanee on Tafseer Ibn Katheer, Saheeh Al-Bukhaaree and Saheeh Muslim.
I would go over several books and there I met two noble Shaikhs from the scholars of Yemen:
First: The Judge, Yahyaa al-Ashwal. I would study Subul-us-Salaam of as-San’aanee with him and he would teach me any subject that I asked him about.
Second: Shaikh ‘Abdur-Razzaaq ash-Shaahidhee al-Muhwaytee. He would also teach me whatever I asked him about.
Then the educational institute in Makkah opened and I took the entrance exam with a group of students, and I passed, all praise be to Allaah.
The most distinguished of our teachers there was Shaikh ‘Abdul-‘Azeez as-Subayyal. I, along with a group of students from the institute, would also study with Shaikh ‘Abdullaah bin Muhammad bin Humayd, may Allaah have mercy on him, the book at-Tuhfah as-Saniyyah after ‘Ishaa at the Haram. He, may Allaah have mercy on him, would bring many points of benefit from Ibn ‘Aqeel and other scholars’ explanation. The lessons were above the level of my colleagues, so they began to slip away until he eventually stopped the class.
I also studied along with a group of students with Shaikh Muhammad as-Subayyal, may Allaah preserve him, the subject of the Laws of Inheritance.
After staying in the institute for some time, I left to go to my family in Najraan. Then I brought them to live with me in Makkah. We resided there together for the length of my studies in the institute and the Haram itself, which lasted six years.
The blessing of studying in the masaajid is well known. Do not ask about the friendly environment and relaxation we felt while in the masaajid. The Prophet (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) indeed spoke the truth when he said: “A group of people do not gather together in one of the Houses of Allaah, reciting the Book of Allaah and studying it amongst themselves, except that tranquility descends upon them, angels surround them, mercy engulfs them, and Allaah mentions them to those by Him.”
So I would spend the day studying in the institute, and all of the lessons would assist my Creed and Religion. Then from after ‘Asr till after the ‘Ishaa prayer, I would go to the Haram and drink from the Zamzam water, about which the Prophet (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) said: “Verily, it is a drink that satiates and a cure for diseases."
And we would listen to the speakers that came to Makkah from different lands to perform Hajj or ‘Umrah.
From the teachers that we learned from at the Haram between Maghrib and ‘Ishaa was Shaikh ‘Abdul-‘Azeez bin Raashid an-Najdee, author of the book “Tayseer-ul-Wahyain fil-Iqtisaar ‘alal-Qur’aani was-Saheehain”, in which he has errors that we don’t agree with him on. He, may Allaah have mercy on him, used to say: “The authentic ahaadeeth that are not found in the two Saheeh Collections can be counted on one’s fingers.” This statement of his stuck to my mind since I had objections to it. This was all the way until I decided to write “As-Saheeh-ul-Musnad mimmaa laysa fis-Saheehain” after which I became more certain about the falsehood of his statement, Allaah have mercy on him.
However, he was a man of Tawheed, who had strong knowledge of the Science of Hadeeth and was able to distinguish the authentic from the weak and the defective from the pure with regard to hadeeth. What amazed me about him was that he would call people away from taqleed (blind-following), to the point that he wrote a treatise called “At-Tawaagheet-ul-Muqanna’” [Masked Deities of Falsehood]. So the government, and likewise some of the senior scholars, thought that he intended them by it. So the committee of senior scholars gathered together to debate with him. They said: “Did you intend us and the government with this book?” So he replied: “If you feel that you possess the characteristics that I mentioned in the book, then it includes you. And if you feel that you do not possess those characteristics that I mentioned in the book, then it doesn’t include you.” Thereafter, the book was banned from entering into the Kingdom. I was informed about this.
One night, he was asked to give a class, but it was as if to only test him. So he began his class with Allaah’s statement: “Follow that which has been revealed to you from your Lord and do not follow false gods besides Him. Little do you remember.” [Surah Al-A’raaf: 3] He followed that with numerous ayaat that prove the prohibition of taqleed (blind-following). After this, he was restricted from teaching at the Haram, and we ask Allaah’s aid.
And from my teachers at the Grand Mosque (Haram) of Makkah who I benefited from was Shaikh Muhammad bin ‘Abdillaah as-Sumaalee, for I attended his lessons for about seven or more months. And he was an ayah (manifest sign) in terms of knowledge of the narrators used by the two Shaikhs (Al-Bukhaaree and Muslim). I benefited immensely from him in the Science of Hadeeth. All praise to my Lord, since I started seeking knowledge, I didn’t love anything except knowledge of the Book and the Sunnah.
After I completed the intermediate and secondary levels of the educational institute in Makkah, and after completing all of my religious lessons, I moved to Madeenah to go to the Islamic University there. Most of us transferred to the Faculty of Da’wah and Usool-ud-Deen. The most distinguished of those who taught us there were: Shaikh as-Sayyid Muhammad al-Hakeem and Shaikh Mahmood ‘Abdul-Wahhaab Faa’id, both from Egypt. When vacation time came, I feared that time would go by wasted so I joined the Faculty of Sharee’ah, due to two reasons, the first of which was to acquire knowledge.
This was since some of the classes there were successive while others were combined. So it was a like a repetition of what we had studied in the Faculty of Da’wah. I completed both Faculty courses, all praise be to Allaah, and I was given two degrees. However, all praise be to Allaah, I give no regard to certificates; what merits recognition in my opinion is knowledge.
In the same year that I finished the two College courses, an advanced studies program opened in the Islamic University, which they called the Masters program. So I went for the interview exam and passed, all praise be to Allaah. The advanced studies course was on the Science of Hadeeth. All praise be to Allaah, I studied the subject that I loved the most. The most prominent of those who taught us there was Shaikh Muhammad al-Ameen al-Misree, may Allaah have mercy on him, Shaikh As-Sayyid Muhammad al-Hakeem al-Misree, and during the last part of my studies, Shaikh Hammaad bin Muhammad al-Ansaaree. On some nights, I would attend the classes of Shaikh ‘Abdul-‘Azeez bin Baaz in the Prophet’s Mosque (in Madeenah) on the subject of Saheeh Muslim. I would also attend the gatherings of Shaikh Al-Albaanee, which were specified to only the students of knowledge, in order to learn from him.
While I was in Makkah, I would teach some of the students of knowledge from the books Qatar-un-Nadaa and at-Tuhfah as-Saniyyah. And while I was in Madeenah, I would teach some of my brothers the book at-Tuhfah as-Saniyyah in the Prophet’s Mosque. Then I promised my Muslim brothers that I would hold classes on the Jaami’ (Sunan) of at-Tirmidhee, Qatar-un-Nadaa and Al-Baa’ith-ul-Hatheeth for them in my house after ‘Asr.
So a great wave of Da’wah spread from Madeenah, which filled the world in the time-span of six years. It was some righteous people who were ones who took on the task of financing it, while Muqbil bin Haadee and his Muslim brothers were the ones who took on the task of teaching their fellow brothers. As for traveling for the purpose of Calling to Allaah throughout all regions of the Kingdom, then this was shared between all of the brothers – the student of knowledge so that he can acquire knowledge and benefit others, and the common person so that he could learn. This was such that many of the common folk benefited and grew to love the (Salafi) Da’wah.
One of our Muslim brothers from amongst the students of knowledge was an Imam of a masjid in Riyadh. One time some people of knowledge rebuked him for using a sutrah. So he said: “We are unable to in front of you, but by Allaah, no one but a common person will get up to teach you the ahaadeeth of the Sutrah.” So he called a brother from the general folk who loved the Da’wah and had memorized the ahaadeeth of the Sutrah from “Al-Lu’lu wal-Marjaan feemataffaqa ‘alayhi ash-Shaikhaan.” So he got up and narrated these ahaadeeth, after which the opposers felt ashamed and stayed quiet.
After this, the blind followers and the scholars of evil began to set in motion, and the reason for this stirring of the blind-followers, who were considered scholars in the eyes of the people, was because whenever they would find a young student of knowledge amongst our students and they would use a hadeeth as proof, the student would say to them: “Who reported the hadeeth?” And this was something they were not accustomed to. Then he would say to them: “What is the status (i.e. grading) of the hadeeth?” This was something that they also weren’t accustomed to. So they would embarrass them in front of the people. And sometimes the student would say to them: “This is a weak hadeeth. There is so and so in its chain of narration and so and so declared him weak.” So upon hearing this, it is as if the earth would become constricted beneath these blind-followers. And they would then go about spreading lies that these students were Khawaarij, when in fact the brothers were not from the Khawaarij who make it lawful to shed a Muslim’s blood and who deem a Muslim a disbeliever on the count of sins.
However, there would occur some errors on the part of some of the new brothers, and this was because the beginner is almost always overwhelmed with excessive zeal. At that time, I was preparing my Master’s dissertation, when all of a sudden one night, before I knew what was happening, they arrested me and arrested almost one hundred and fifty others. Some people were able to escape, but the earth trembled between those who opposed and those who agreed with out arrest. We remained in prison for a month or a month and a half. After that we were set free, all praise be to Allaah.
Shortly after this, the treatises from Juhaymaan were released and a group of us were again arrested. [2] During the interrogation, they asked me: “Where you the one who wrote this?” What, Juhaymaan can’t write? So I denied this, and Allaah knows that I didn’t write it nor did I assist in any part of it. But after staying in jail for three months, an order was made for foreigners to be deported.
When I arrived at Yemen, I went back to my village and stayed there for a while teaching the children Qur’aan. Before I knew it, it seemed like the whole world was in an all-out battle against me. It was as if I had come out to destroy the country, the Religion and the rulership. At that time, I didn’t know any leader or tribal chief. So I would say: “Allaah is sufficient for me and the best of Guardians.” When things would get tight, I would go to San’aa or to Haashid or to Dhimmaar, and also to Ta’iz, Ibb and Hudaydah to give Da’wah and to visit the Muslims brothers.
After some days, some good-doers sent me my library from Madeenah. They sent the books to Sa’adah where the head of shipments there was malicious of the Sunnah. Some of our companions went to request the books from him, so he said: “Come back after Dhuhr, Allaah willing.” But he didn’t return after Dhuhr. Instead, some Shiites mobilized and requested the caretakers to confiscate the books because they were Wahaabbi books!
Do not ask about the monetary fees, hardships and injustice that occurred to me as a result of trying to get my books! Many of the brothers from the inhabitants of my country made great efforts to follow that up, including Shaikh ‘Abdullaah bin Husayn al-Ahmar, Shaikh Hazaa’ Dab’aan, the caretakers of the Guidance and Counseling Center, such as the Judge Yahyaa al-Fasayyal, may Allaah have mercy on him, and brother ‘Aa’id bin ‘Alee Mismaar. After a long difficulty, the people of Sa’adah sent a telegraph to the President ‘Alee bin ‘Abdillaah bin Saalih, so he assigned the case to the judge, ‘Alee as-Samaan. The judge sent me a letter and promised that he would turn over the library to me. And he said: “The people of Sa’adah are very strict. They call the scholars of San’aa disbelievers.” So I went to San’aa to get my books. Allaah decreed that my books arrive there while the judge ‘Alee Samaan was out of the country on a mission. So when some of the brothers went to ask for it, the head of the Ministry of Endowments told them: “These books need to be inspected.” So some of our Muslim brothers at the Center for Guidance and Counseling mobilized and went to request the books. So they said: “These books are under our jurisdiction. We must examine them, so whatever is upright, we will hand over to al-Waadi’ee and whatever violates the Religion, we will keep it with us.” So by doing this, they discovered that the books were in fact purely religious and turned the them over to me without inspecting them, so may Allaah reward them.
I brought the books into my country, all praise be to Allaah. And my close ones, may Allaah reward them, built a small library and a small masjid. And they said: “We will pray Jumu’ah here to avoid hardships and problems. Sometimes we would pray there with only six people present.
One time the governor Haadee al-Hasheeshi asked for me, so I went to Shaikh Qaa’id Majlee, may Allaah have mercy on him, who then called him and said: “What do you want from al-Waadi’ee?” He said: “Nothing, except to get to know him.” So he said: “We will look for him in his institute.”
In another instance, some other leader asked for me and so Husayn bin Qaa’id Majlee went with me to see him. He (Majlee) began to talk against the Shee’ah and explain to him that we call to the Qur’aan and the Sunnah and that the Shee’ah hate us because of that because they fear that the truth will come out about them, so this leader said: “Indeed, the Shiites have tainted the history of Yemen, so as long as your Da’wah (call) is as you say it is, then call to it and we are with you.”
After this I spent some time with my library. Only a few days had passed when some Egyptian brothers came and we started classes on some of the books of Hadeeth and the Arabic Language. After this, students continued to come from Egypt, Kuwait, the Sacred Lands (Makkah and Madeenah), Najd, ‘Aden, Hadramaut, Algeria, Libya, Somalia, Belgium, and other Muslim and non-Muslim countries.
The number of students has now reached between six to seven hundred students, amongst which are a hundred and seventy families.[3] And Allaah is the One who provides them with sustenance. And all of this is not because of our might or power, nor due to the amount of knowledge we have or because of our courage or eloquence in speech. Rather, this is something that Allaah willed to be. So He was the One, all praise to Allaah, that granted us this blessing.
[End of Translation of Shaikh Muqbil’s Autobiography]
His Death:
Shaikh Muqbil bin Haadee Al-Waadi’ee passed away on the 2nd of Jumaadal-Oolaa, 1422H (7/21/2001) due to a liver disease that he was suffering from for a long time, and due to which he traveled to America, Germany and Saudi Arabia during the last part of his life to seek treatment for. He was around seventy years of age when he died in Jeddah. His funeral prayer was held in Makkah and he was buried in the Al-‘Adl Cemetery near the graves of Shaikhs Ibn Baaz and Ibn Al-‘Uthaimeen, may Allaah have mercy on all of them.
The Scholars’ Praise for him:
Shaikh Muhammad bin Saalih Al-‘Uthaimeen said: “Tell him that I consider him to be a mujaddid.”
Shaikh Al-Albaanee said: “So degrading and belittling these two Shaikhs (Rabee' and Muqbil), who call to the Qur'aan and the Sunnah and what the Salaf As-Saalih were upon and who wage war against those who oppose this correct methodology. As is quite clear to everyone, it either comes from one of two types of people. Either it comes from someone who is ignorant or someone who follows his desires... If he is ignorant, then he can be taught. But if he is one who follows his desires, then we seek Allaah's refuge from the evil of this person. And we ask Allaah, Mighty and Sublime, to either guide him or break his back." [The Audio series Silsilah al-Hudaa wan-Noor: 1/851]
Shaikh Yahyaa al-Hajooree reported that Shaikh Rabee’ Al-Madkhalee said about him: “He is the mujaddid in the lands of Yemen” and that he said: “there can’t be found from the time of ‘Abdur-Razaaq as-San’aanee to this present day someone who established the Da’wah and revived it as the likes of Al-Waadi’ee.” [4]
________
Footnotes:
[1] Translator’s Note: In her biographical account of her father, Umm ‘Abdillaah Al-Waadi’iyyah said: “His father died while he was young and he didn’t know him. So he grew up as an orphan and under the care of his mother for a period of time. She would ask him to work to make money and order him to look at the state of his community so that he could be like them. But he would turn away from this and say: ‘I will go out to study.’ So she would say: ‘May Allaah guide you.’ She would supplicate for him to be guided, as several women who were around at that time informed me. Perhaps her supplication coincided with the time when supplications are accepted since he became one of the guided, guiding others.” [Nubdhah Mukhtasarah: pg. 18]
[2] Translator’s Note: This refers to Juhaymaan bin Muhammad al-‘Utaybee, a deviant from Saudi Arabia who took over the Grand Mosque of Makkah with hundreds of followers in 1979, and held it for several days, after which the senior scholars allowed force to be used in the sacred site of the Ka’bah in order to regain it. The Saudi National Guard subdued them about two weeks later after much blood was shed and casualties were lost on the part of the rebels and the Saudi army. The remaining dissidents that were captured were later beheaded. Shaikh Al-Albaanee (rahimahullaah) mentioned this Juhaymaan in his book as-Saheehah (5/872), saying: “…And like the followers of the Saudi Juhaymaan, who caused the fitnah in the Grand Mosque in Makkah at the beginning of the 1400’s (Hijree). He claimed that the awaited Mahdee was with him and sought from those present in the Mosque to give him bay’ah (allegiance). Some of the simple-minded, heedless and evil people followed him. Then Allaah put an end to their fitnah after they had shed much of the Muslims’ blood."
[3] Translator’s Note: It must be re-emphasized here that this statement comes from the second edition of his autobiography, which was printed in 1999. Since then these numbers have continued to increase, such that in present times, the Shaikh's school, which is now taught and supervised by Shaikh Yahyaa Al-Hajooree has around 1000 students and 500 families, all praise be to Allaah.
[4] Translator’s Note: These quotes are from the book Nubdhah Mukhtasarah of Shaikh Muqbil’s daughter Umm ‘Abdillaah (pg. 46)

Thursday, August 24, 2006

Abandoning Innovation and Its People


Imaam Ahmad said:
Wakee' narrated to us from Sufyaan, from Ja'afar, from his father, from Jaabir who said: The Messenger of Allaah (Sallallaahu 'Alayhi Wa Sallam) stood and gave us a sermon. So he praised Allaah, and lauded Him with what was befitting of Him, and he said: Whoever is guided by Allaah, then no wayward person can misguide him. And whoever is misguided [by Him] then there is no guide for him. Verily the best of speech is the Book of Allaah, and the best of guidance is the guidance of Muhammad (Sallallaahu 'Alayhi Wa Sallam), and the worst of matters are newly invented ones. And every newly invented matter is an innovation. And every innovation is in the Fire.
[A combination of different versions of this hadeeth by Jaabir Ibn Abdullaah - in Muslim (3/11), Ahmad (3/381), Nisaa`ee (1/234), Bayhaqee (3/214). The above combination was put together by Imaam al-Bayhaqee in his Al Asmaa Was Sifaat.]
'Abdullaah Ibn Mas'ood said:
Follow and do not innovate, for indeed you have been sufficed.
[Reported authentically in Ad-Daarimee (no.211) At-Tabaraanee in Al-Kabeer (no. 8870), Al Bayhaqee (no. 204), Ibn Wadaah in Bid'ah Wan Nahee 'Anhaa (p. 10), and also from Qataadah on (p.11). Also related by Abee Khaythamah in Al Ilm (no. 54). Shaykh Al Albaanee has authenticated the narration in Bid'ah Wan Nahee 'Anhaa]
'Umar Ibn 'Abdul 'Azeez said:
Stop where the people have stopped! For indeed, they stopped upon receiving knowledge. The clear evidences would suffice them, and they were the strongest at manifesting them. If there were any merit in something, then they would be the most deserving of it. So if you say: 'It was introduced after them' , then no one introduces something into it except that he has opposed their guidance, and desired other than their example. They have described it from what was sufficient, and they have spoken concerning it - what sufficed. What is above them is excessiveness, and what is below them is inadequacy. Some people have fallen short of them, and so they have drawn away. And others have transgressed them, so they have become extreme. But indeed they were between these two (extremes) upon a straight path.
[Reported by Ibn Qudaamah in Al Burhaan li Bayaanil Qur'aan (p. 88-89), as a statement of 'Abdul 'Azeez Ibn Abil Maajishoon and then he said: He related it's meaning back to 'Umar Ibn 'Abdul 'Azeez. al Haafidh Ibnul Jawzee in Manaqibul Umar Ibn Abdul Azeez (p. 83-84). al Haafidh Ibn Rajab Fadhlul Ilmis Salaf (p. 36)]
Imaam al-Awzaa'ee said:
Stick to the example of those who came before you (Salafus Saalih), even if the people reject you. And beware of the opinions of men, even if they beautify it for you with their speech.
[Reported by Khateebul Baghdaadee in Sharaf As'haabil Hadeeth (p. 7). Imaam Al Aajurree in Ash Sharee'ah (p. 58). Ibn 'Abdul Barr in Jaami'ul Ilm Wa Fadhlihi (2/114). Imaam adh Dhahabee confirmed it in Siyar A'alaamun Nubalaa (7/120). Shaykh Al Albaanee authenticated it in Mukhtasir Al Uloow (p. 138).]
Muhammad Ibn Abdur Rahmaan al-Adramee said to a man who was speaking about an innovation, and calling the people to it:
Did the Messenger of Allaah (Sallallaahu 'Alayhi Wa Sallam), Abu Bakr, 'Umar, 'Uthmaan, and 'Alee have knowledge of it, or did they not know of it? He said: They did not know of it. He said: Something which they did not have knowledge of, you know!?! The man said: Then I say that they did know it. He said: Was it sufficient for them that they did not speak about it, nor call the people to it, or was it not sufficient for them? The man said: Of course it was sufficient for them. He said: So something which was sufficient for the Messenger of Allaah (Sallallaahu 'Alayhi Wa Sallam) and his Caliphs is not sufficient for you!?! So the man refrained, and the Caliph who was present there said: May Allaah not suffice for the ones who are not satisfied with what they found sufficient.
[Reported by al Khateeb in Taareekhul Baghdaad (10/75). Ibnul Jawzee in Manaaqibul Imaam Ahmad (p. 431, 436). Ibn Qudaamah in At Tawaabeen (p. 194). Imaam adh Dhahabee in Siyar A'alaamun Nubalaa (11/131). Imaam Al Aajurree in Ash Sharee'ah (p. 91,95). Ibn Katheer in Al Bidaayah Wan Nihaayah (10/335).]
[Extracted from: http://www.troid.org/articles/manhaj/innovation\. Adaptations done with regards to the font and formating of text.]

Wednesday, August 16, 2006

Dawa Exhibition Reaches Out to 80,000 People



Dawa Exhibition Reaches Out to 80,000 People
P.K. Abdul Ghafour, Arab News

JEDDAH, 16 August 2006 — The 8th Dawa Exhibition held in Taif recently attracted nearly 80,000 visitors including foreign delegates and witnessed two expatriates — an American man and a Filipino woman — embrace Islam.

More than 28,300 women attended special programs held for them at the Industrial Exhibition Center on the sidelines of the show. The large turnout of women reflected their interest in dawa (propagation) of Islam as encouraged by the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him).

About 110 government departments, charitable organizations, dawa centers, publishing houses, computer companies and other related businesses took part in the 10-day show that had previously visited Dammam, Jeddah, Riyadh, Qassim, Madinah, Abha and Sakaka.
While opening the exhibition, Minister of Islamic Affairs Saleh Al-Sheikh urged Muslims to utilize modern dawa resources, such as computer programs and Internet sites, to propagate the message of Islam.

Ahmed Al-Sabban, deputy minister of Islamic affairs for planning and development and chairman of the organizing committee, said the ministry would continue to stage such shows in other cities with even more new programs.

The Cooperative Office for Dawa and Guidance in East Jeddah won the first prize for the best pavilion. The second prize went to the Dawa Center in Al-Rass and the third prize was awarded to the Qur’an Memorization Society in Taif.

A Kuwaiti delegation and a 40-member Jordanian delegation representing the Qur’an Memorization Society in Al-Kerak, which was led by the former member of Parliament Dr. Ahmed Al-Koufehi, also visited the show. Seventeen students from an orphanage in Al-Ahsa also toured the exhibition’s pavilions.

The exhibition, the first of which began six years ago, has won public applause and recognition through its attractive programs. The organizers of the Taif show held daily cultural competitions that allowed people to answer questions through the Internet. Many people, who were not able to visit the exhibition, were able to participate in the contest via the Net.

Jowhara Al-Muhanna, a British woman who embraced Islam about 20 years ago, was present at the show. She said she was attracted to Islam after hearing adhan (the call to prayer) while watching the film “Omar Al-Mukhtar.”

A Filipino woman named Um Asma, who came in to the fold of Islam thanks to the efforts of the Dawa Center in East Jeddah, explained the reasons that led her to embracing Islam. She emphasized the role of government departments in promoting dawa work.

Maryam Muhammad, head of public relations for the women’s wing, said the programs for women were held from 4 p.m. to 11 p.m. during four days of the show. Wafa Al-Hamdan delivered a lecture on the role of women in dawa, while Dr. Fouz Al-Kurdi spoke about the importance of education. Hussa Al-Saghir delivered a speech on Islamic dress while Anahid Al-Sumairy spoke about the role of mothers in bringing up their children in accordance with the moderate teachings of Islam.

Aneesa Al-Ibrahim, director of Taawun Charity, said the exhibition was successful, as the programs held impressed visitors. The program entitled “Kaifa Al-Hal” in which comparisons were drawn between the stories of Prophets and the present day life and conditions of Muslims proved especially popular.


http://www.arabnews.com/?page=1&section=0&article=80873&d=16&m=8&y=2006

Tuesday, August 15, 2006

Salafis supporting the Shi'ah in their War?!


Below is an entry posted on SalafiTalk.Net by Akh Abu Khadeejah Abdul-Waahid from Salafi Publications, Birmingham, England:


حكم تقريب بين اهل السنة والروافض والتعاون معهم للجهاد اجاب عليها الامام بن باز رحمه ا
"The Ruling Concerning The Coming Together Between The Ahlus-Sunnah And The Rawaafidh (Shee'ah) & Co-operation With Them In Jihaad"
Answer by Al-Imaam Ibn Baaz
(May Allaah's Mercy be upon him)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
مجموع فتاوى ومقالات: الجزء الخامس
Source: Majmoo Fatawaa wa Maqaalaat, Volume 5.
س7 : من خلال معرفة سماحتكم بتاريخ الرافضة ، ما هو موقفكم من مبدأ التقريب بين أهل السنة وبينهم ؟

Question: Based upon the knowledge of your eminence of the history of the Raafidhah [Shee'ah]. What is your position regarding initiating the coming together between Ahlus-Sunnah and between them?


ج7 : التقريب بين الرافضة وبين أهل السنة غير ممكن؛ لأن العقيدة مختلفة ، فعقيدة أهل السنة والجماعة توحيد الله وإخلاص العبادة لله سبحانه وتعالى ، وأنه لا يدعى معه أحد لا ملك مقرب ولا نبي مرسل وأن الله سبحانه وتعالى هو الذي يعلم الغيب ، ومن عقيدة أهل السنة محبة الصحابة رضي الله عنهم جميعا والترضي عنهم والإيمان بأنهم أفضل خلق الله بعد الأنبياء وأن أفضلهم أبو بكر الصديق ، ثم عمر ، ثم عثمان ، ثم علي ، رضي الله عن الجميع ، والرافضة خلاف ذلك فلا يمكن الجمع بينهما ، كما أنه لا يمكن الجمع بين اليهود والنصارى والوثنيين وأهل السنة ، فكذلك لا يمكن التقريب بين الرافضة وبين أهل السنة لاختلاف العقيدة التي أوضحناها

Answer: "The coming together of Ahlus-Sunnah and the Raafidhah is not possible because the beliefs are different. The Belief of the Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamaa'ah is to single out Allaah alone with worship and sincerely making worship for Allaah, The Most Perfect, The Most High, and not to call upon anyone along with Him, neither an Angel drawn close nor a Prophet sent.

And it is Allaah who knows the matters of the Unseen. And from the belief of the Ahlus-Sunnah is love of the Companions, may Allaah be pleased with all of them and He is pleased with them – and to believe that they are the most excellent of the creation of Allaah after the Prophets, and the best of them is Abu Bakr As-Siddeeq, then 'Umar, then 'Uthmaan, then 'Alee, may Allaah be pleased with all of them. And the Raafidhah oppose this, so there is no reconciling between the two [beliefs], just as there is no reconciling between the Jews, the Christians, the idol-worshippers and the Ahlus-Sunnah. So for this reason there is no coming closer between the Raafidhah and between the Ahlus-Sunnah due to the differing beliefs as we have clarified."


س8 : وهل يمكن التعامل معهم لضرب العدو الخارجي كالشيوعية وغيرها؟

Question: Is it possible/permissible to fight alongside them (i.e. the Raafidhah) against the foreign enemy such as the communists and so on?


ج8 : لا أرى ذلك ممكنا ، بل يجب على أهل السنة أن يتحدوا وأن يكونوا أمة واحدة وجسدا واحدا وأن يدعوا الرافضة أن يلتزموا بما دل عليه كتاب الله وسنة الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم من الحق ، فإذا التزموا بذلك صاروا إخواننا وعلينا أن نتعاون معهم ، أما ما داموا مصرين على ما هم عليه من بغض الصحابة وسب الصحابة إلا نفرا قليلا وسب الصديق وعمر وعبادة أهل البيت كعلي - رضي الله عنه - وفاطمة والحسن والحسين ، واعتقادهم في الأئمة الاثني عشرة أنهم معصومون وأنهم يعلمون الغيب؛ كل هذا من أبطل الباطل وكل هذا يخالف ما عليه أهل السنة والجماعة

Answer: "I don’t see that to be possible/permissible. Rather it is obligatory upon Ahlus-Sunnah to be united and be a single ummah, a singular body and to invite the Raafidhah to adhere to whatever is indicated by the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of the Messenger, may the peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him, by way of the Truth.

And if they cling to that, they will be our brothers and upon us would be to co-operate with them. And so long as they continue upon that which they are upon from hatred of the Companions except for a few of them; so their cursing of As-Siddeeq (Abu Bakr) and 'Umar and their worship of the household of the Prophet such as 'Alee, may Allaah be pleased with him, and of Faatimah, Hasan and Hussain – and likewise their belief in the twelve Imaams that they are infallible and that know the affairs of the Unseen; and all this from the most false of falsehoods – And all this opposes that which Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamaa'ah are upon."

Shaykh Ahmad an-Najmee on Lebanon


Below is an entry posted on SalafiTalk.Net by Akh Abu 'Iyaad Amjad bin Muhammad Rafiq from Cleveland, UK:

Audio is available in this thread on Sahab.Net
http://www.sahab.net/forums/showthread.php?t=337390

The Shaykh was asked about fighting along with the Hizbullah who represent the Shi'ah, and about making supplication for them for aid.

The Shaykh answered:

Firstly, it is obligatory that we supplicate against the state of Israel, that Allaah does not enable Israel the capacity to afflict the Muslims with what it afflicts them with of killing and injury.

The second affair, if we supplicate then we intend by our supplication, Ahl us-Sunnah, that Allaah the Mighty and Majestic aids them, and there is no doubt that there are Ahl us-Sunnah in Lebanon, so we intend them with our supplication.

Sunday, August 13, 2006

Shaykh Rabee' on Lebanon and the Baatinee Raafidah



Below is an entry posted on SalafiTalk.Net by Akh Abu 'Iyaad Amjad bin Muhammad Rafiq from Cleveland, UK:

http://www.sahab.net/forums/showthread.php?t=337224

...I ask you now: This flag (of leadership) that is in Lebanon, (is it) a flag (of leadership) that deserves to be called a flag (of leadership) in the path of Allaah, (to be) called jihaad in the path of Allaah, whilst they distort it with a distortion within which (even) the Jews have not rivalled them. You have not read (the writings of) the Raafidah. Whoever reads (their writings) will find that they are more severe in their distortion of the deen of Allaah than the Jews and the Christians, may Allaah bless you......

Now, the Hizbullaah have been fighting for three weeks, only 8 of them have been killed, and close to a thousand from the Lebanese society have been killed and their abodes destroyed.......

We desire Jihaad, but the correct (i.e. legislated) Jihaad......

This is an acrobatic jihaad (i.e. precarious), a Raafidee jihaad.......

We believe in Jihaad more than those liars......

And whence does this Raafidee, this Baatinee (i.e. Hasan Nasrullaah) come to lead the Ummah?

Allaamah Saalih bin Fawzaan al-Fawzaan on the war in Lebanon


Below is an article from http://www.salafitalk.net/st/ to relate to my earlier entry, "Do not cooperate with or support Hezbollah!":


Source: Sahab.net

THE FULL TEXT


"Today the Muslims are suffering from several different predicaments which are caused by the disbelievers generally being superior (in power) over them.

There are wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine and Lebanon.

The only thing we read in news and hear from our preachers and writers is that they all condemn the actions of the disbelievers.

With regards to this there is no doubt. However, do these voices and shouts really frighten the disbelieving enemy? For a long while in history, the enemy has wanted to destroy Islam. Allah (ta'ala) said:

"Nor will they cease fighting you until they turn you back from your faith if they can." [2:217]

But what have the Muslims done in order to prepare themselves to confront them and their wicked deeds? It's upon the Muslims to do the following:


1. Contemplate over their religious condition and to hold on firmly to their religion. That which has happened to them is the result of their religious negligence. In one report it says:

"If the one who knows Me is disobedient towards Me, then I will let the one who doesn't know Me take the authority over him."

What happened with the Children of Israa'eel when they left their religion and planted mischief on the earth? Allah allowed the fire worshippers to take authority over them for a long period. This in mentioned by Allah in the beginning of the chapter "al-Isra". Allah threatened to punish them if they returned to the same condition. Likewise, we have to look at our condition and correct that which we have destroyed within our religion, as Allah's way doesn't change. He (ta'ala) said:

"Verily never will Allah change the condition of a people until they change what is in themselves; but when Allah wants a people to be punished, there can be no turning it back, and no one but Allah can help them." [13.11]


2. We have to gather strength in order to confront our enemy. He (ta'ala) said:

"Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war to strike fear into the hearts of the enemies of Allah and your enemies and others besides whom you may not know but whom Allah does know." [8.60]

This should be done by (the Muslims nations) preparing armies, suitable weapons (of the Muslim nations) and deterring power.


3. Unite all Muslims upon one and the same religious belief and Islamic creed. And implement the rules and regulations of the Shari'ah in all our aspects of life such as in manners and dealings with people. We have to let Allah's book dictate our lives and enjoy the good and forbid the evil and call people to Islam with knowledge, insight and sincerity. He (ta'ala) said:

"And hold fast all of you together to the rope of Allah and do not be divided". [3.103]

However, it is impossible to unite if the religious methodologies and goals are different from one another. If only our preachers and correctors would have focused themselves on these points that I have mentioned at the same time as they are criticizing the attacking enemy.

It must be made known and exposed that the evil goals of our enemy not only is about weakening the Muslims, rather we need to understand that their prime goal is to destroy the Muslim's Islamic belief so that he (the Muslim) then will turn his back to his religion.

This is what I wanted to say with regards to this catastrophe. It is Allah Who tells the truth and guides to the right path.

May Allah's blessings and peace be with our Prophet Mohammad, his family and his followers."

Saturday, August 12, 2006

"Why are people silent at the extermination of whole nations?"


Samar Fatany, a Jeddah radio broadcaster, speaks for many while pointing to the world’s double standard and the UN’s seeming impotence: “The need of the hour is to force Israel to comply with international humanitarian laws. Israel is terrorizing innocent people and seems to be a law unto itself. The world leaders are just watching. You cannot allow this blind support to Israel. Any resolution in the UN Security Council is vetoed. This is atrocious and has to stop. There will be lawlessness in the world. If we want to have some kind of law and order, then international laws must be respected and they should be for all to comply. Otherwise the whole region will be in flames.”

Arab journalists are expressing fury at Israel’s rampage and Washington’s support of it. There is a surging tide of bitterness and alienation against the United States’ Middle East policies brought to full flood by Washington’s refusal to rein in the Israelis in Lebanon and Gaza. According to Arabic newspapers, the message is clear: “If the US continues its policy of slavish support for Israel it will reap a harvest of hatred that will last for generations.”

The Arab youngsters are likewise bitter at the US. “When will the US rein in Israel? Where are the justice-loving American people?” they ask. “Aggression and kidnappings by Israeli forces are commonplace and when there is a little retaliation, it brings about a brutal and disproportionate response.”

The non-implementation of UN Resolutions 242 and 338 (which call on Israel to quit Arab lands occupied in the 1967 war) has been repeatedly highlighted in the Arabic media as being the main source of conflict in the region. “It (the non-implementation) speaks volumes about Israeli contempt for the international community. Both Israel and the US keep harping about Resolution 1559 (which calls for disarming Hezbollah) while conveniently forgetting 242 and 338,” one Arabic daily pointed out in a recent editorial.

The general view on the Arab street is that the West and Israel refer to the UN resolutions when they suit them. “The West is not bothered when Muslim and Arab blood is spilled. UN resolutions or no resolutions, Muslim blood is cheap — Israeli and Western lives are precious,” wrote one Saudi blogger.

Prayer leaders across the Arab world are questioning the silence of the international community. “Why are people silent at the extermination of whole nations? Where are the people who sing hymns of freedom and human rights and against violations of sovereignty? What happened to those people who shout slogans of democracy and world peace?” asked the imam during his sermon at the Grand Mosque in Makkah recently.

The extent of Saudi emotional commitment to Lebanon can be gauged from the telethon organized recently; it raised millions for Lebanon. The Kingdom has also established medical facilities in Lebanon to treat victims of the Israeli attacks. Saudis have begun sending food, medical supplies, blankets and bottles of water in cooperation with Lebanese and international NGOs such as the World Food Program and UNICEF.

Friday, August 11, 2006

Issues pertaining to shaking/kissing hands 2


Ruling on shaking hands with one’s mother’s maternal aunt


Question:

What is the ruling on greeting my mother’s maternal aunt?

Answer:

Praise be to Allaah.

Your mother’s maternal aunt is also a maternal aunt for you. And you are a mahram for her, so there is nothing wrong with your shaking hands with her.

Allaah says, explaining who is a mahram (interpretation of the meaning):

“Forbidden to you (for marriage) are: your mothers, your daughters, your sisters, your father’s sisters, your mother’s sisters…”
[al-Nisa’ 4:23]


The word khaalah (mother’s sister or maternal aunt) in the verse includes the maternal aunt of one's father and mother, and grandfathers and grandmothers, and the same applies to paternal aunts.

Al-Sa’di said (p. 244):

‘Ammah (paternal aunt) refers to the sister of your father and grandfather, no matter how far the line of ascent reaches, and khaalah (maternal aunt) refers to the sister of your mother and grandmother, no matter how far back the line of ascent reaches. End quote. See also Tafseer al-Qaasimi, 5/86

It says in Zaad al-Mustaqni’, when discussing which woman are mahrams: Every paternal aunt and maternal aunt, no matter how far back they go.

Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in his commentary: “No matter how far back they go” means the maternal and paternal aunts of one's father, or the maternal or paternal aunts of one’s mother, or the maternal aunt of one's grandmother, or the paternal aunt of one’s grandfather or grandmother, and so on ad infinitum. End quote from al-Sharh al-Mumti’, 5/184.


Disclaimer: Due to the source (website) being unreliable, all links to it have been removed.


Similarly for a Muslimah, her paternal and maternal uncles are her mahrams.

Wallaahu a'lam.

Issues pertaining to shaking/kissing hands


Since my previous entry on "Citizens banned on kissing King's hand" has brought an interesting response from Akh Mohammad Noh which I believe is worthy of being addressed, below are some articles/fatwas pertaining to it which I believe would answer his questions, questions that I'm sure many of us have in mind.

Disclaimer: Due to the source (website) not being reliable, links to it have been removed.


Bowing to anyone other than Allaah is haraam

Question:

Is it permisible to bow while greeting a respectable/elder person/parent Other than saying "As-salam Alaykum Wa-rahmatullahi Wa-barakatuh".

Answer:

Praise be to Allaah.

The usual greeting is “Assalaamu ‘alaykum wa rahmat-Allaahi wa barakaatuhu (Peace be upon you, and the Mercy of Allaah and His Blessings), because Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“greet one another with a greeting from Allaah (i.e. say: As-Salaamu ‘Alaykum — peace be on you), blessed and good”
[al-Noor 24:61]

The ahaadeeth explain this greeting clearly.

But bowing is not permitted, unless the person being greeted is old and is unable to stand up, or is one of your parents and you do not want to make him or her stand up to shake your hand or embrace you. So if you bow and kiss his head or forehead out of respect for the rights that he has over you, then this is not the kind of bowing that constitutes an act of worship. Undoubtedly bowing is an act of worship towards Allaah, as in rukoo’ (the bowing in prayer), so if that is done without shaking hands or kissing, it is an act of veneration towards that person and is therefore shirk.

Shaykh ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Jibreen.



Prohibition on shaking hands with paternal uncle’s wife even if she is old


Question:

Is it permissible to shake hands with a paternal uncle’s wife if she is old, and if not shaking hands will provoke rancour and resentment, because that is the custom among relatives?

Answer:

Praise be to Allaah.

It is haraam for a man to shake hands with a non-mahram woman even if she is old. That is because of the general meaning of the evidence which states that it is forbidden.

Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:

It is not permissible to shake hands with non-mahram women at all, whether they are young or old, and whether the man who is shaking hands is a young man or an old man, because of the danger of fitnah (temptation) that it poses to both parties. It was narrated in a saheeh hadeeth that the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “I do not shake hands with women.” And ‘Aa’ishah (may Allaah be pleased with her) said: “The hand of the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) never touched the hand of any woman, and he used to accept their oath of allegiance by words only.”

It makes no difference whether one shakes hands with a barrier in between or with no barrier, because of the general meaning of the evidence, and so as to block the ways that may lead to fitnah. And Allaah is the Source of strength.

Fataawa Islamiyyah, 3/76

What some people believe, that the wife of a paternal or maternal uncle is not a stranger (non-mahram) is not correct, and there is no basis for that. Rather the wife of an uncle is a non-mahram.

With regard to what the questioner says that not shaking hands will cause resentment and that this is customary among them, he should refrain from shaking hands with her, and should explain to her that he is not refraining from shaking hands because he despises her or thinks little of her, but rather because he is obeying Allaah and His Messenger. The Muslim has to obey the command of his Lord, and avoid that which He has forbidden, even if that goes against the people’s customs. But he should explain to the people that he is doing that out of obedience to Allaah, and he should be gentle and polite so that he can convince them to follow the sharee’ah and so that they will not think badly of him.

And Allaah knows best.



How should we greet scholars and leaders?


Question:

Is it okay to kiss the hands of Muslim world leaders? Or to bow before them in respect? And what is the correct way to greet them. We think that it is the embrace and handshake for the men.

Answer:

Praise be to Allaah.

Firstly:

The correct way to greet scholars is to greet them with salaam and shake their hand. Many ahaadeeth have been narrated concerning the virtue of these actions. It is also permissible to kiss their heads or hands sometimes, but that should not be taken as a habit or custom, especially if it is done instead of shaking hands.

With regard to embracing, that is permissible when someone comes from a journey or after a long absence, or to express one's deep love for the sake of Allaah and so on.

Muslim (54) narrated that Abu Hurayrah (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “By the One in Whose hand is my soul, you will not enter Paradise until you believe, and you will not believe until you love one another. Shall I not tell you something which, if you do it, you will love one another? Spread the greeting of salaam amongst yourselves.”

And it was narrated that Qataadah said: I said to Anas: Did the companions of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) shake hands with one another? He said: Yes. Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 5908.

And it was narrated that Anas said: When the companions of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) met they would shake hands with one another, and if they came from a journey they would embrace one another.

Narrated by al-Tabaraani in al-Awsat (1/37); classed as saheeh by Shaykh al-Albaani in al-Silsilah al-Saheehah, 2647.

It was narrated from ‘Awn ibn Abi Juhayfah that his father said: When Ja’far came after he had migrated to Abyssinia, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) embraced him and kissed him between the eyes.

Narrated by al-Tabaraani in al-Kabeer (2/108); there are many corroborating reports which were mentioned by al-Haafiz ibn Hajar in al-Talkhees al-Habeer, 4/96/ it was classed as saheeh by Shaykh al-Albaani in al-Silsilah al-Saheehah, 2657.

It was narrated that Usaamah ibn Shareek said: We stood up for the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and kissed his hand.

Narrated by Abu Bakr ibn al-Muqqari in Juz’ Taqbeel al-Yad, p. 58. Al-Haafiz ibn Hajar said: Its isnaad is qawiy. Fath al-Baari, 11/56

Shaykh Muhammad Naasir al-Deen al-Albaani said:

I say: This indicates that the Sahaabah differentiated between whether a person was present or travelling in the manner in which they greeted him. In the first case (when a person was a resident) they shook hands, and in the second case (when a person had come from travelling) they embraced him. Hence I used to avoid embracing when not travelling. In particular, in the first volume of al-Silsilah (no. 160) I narrated a hadeeth in which the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) forbade bowing, embracing and kissing. Then when I prepared that volume for reprinting, I re-examined this hadeeth and noticed that the word embracing is not mentioned in the corroborating reports on the basis of which I had classed the hadeeth as qawiy, so I took it out, as will be seen in the new edition in sha Allaah which will be published shortly, praise be to Allaah.

When I realized that it was weak, I felt comfortable about taking it out, praise be to Allaah. In particular I saw that Ibn al-Teehaan al-Ansaari embraced the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), according to the hadeeth that speaks of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) coming out to the house of Ibn al-Teehaan (may Allaah be pleased with him), which is narrated in al-Shamaa’il al-Muhammadiyyah (no. 113, p. 79 – Mukhtasar al-Shamaa’il). But here it indicates that this is permissible sometimes, not that it is to be done always, as if it were a Sunnah, and as is the case with shaking hands, so attention should be paid to that.

I noted that Imam al-Baghawi spoke about the differentiation mentioned above, and I think it will be very useful to quote him here. He (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in Sharh al-Sunnah (12/293), after mentioning the hadeeth of Ja’far and others which may appear to be contradictions:

With regard to the kind of embracing and kissing that is makrooh, it is that which is done by way of flattery and veneration when a person is not travelling. The kind that is permitted is that which is done when bidding farewell and when a person returns from a journey, and when meeting someone after not seeing him for a long time and when there is intense love for the sake of Allaah.
What is to be kissed is not the mouth but rather the hand, head and forehead.

It is makrooh to do that when one is not travelling as far as I can see, because one meets people frequently and not everyone deserves that. If a man does that to some people and not to others, those whom he ignores will be upset by that and will think that he is falling short and neglecting their rights. The best greeting is the handshake. End quote.

It should be noted that some of the imams, such as Abu Haneefah and his companion Muhammad, are of the view that embracing is makrooh; al-Tahhaawi narrated this from them, which is opposite to the view of Abu Yoosuf.

Imam Maalik also regarded it as makrooh. In al-Adaab al-Shar’iyyah (2/278) it says:

Maalik regarded it as makrooh to embrace one who comes from a journey and said it is a bid’ah (innovation). He explained the fact that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) did that to Ja’far when he came as being a unique case. Sufyaan said to him: You cannot regard it as a unique case without evidence and Maalik fell silent. Al-Qaadi said: The fact that he fell silent indicates that he accepted what Sufyaan said and agreed with him. This is the correct view, so long as there is no evidence that this is a unique case.

We have referred above to the view of Imam al-Baghawi who said that there should be no kissing on the mouth. Shaykh Ibn Muflih explained the reason for that in al-Adaab al-Shar’iyyah (2/275) where he said:

It is makrooh to kiss on the mouth, because it is rarely done out of respect.

And it seems to me that there is another reason, which is that it is not narrated that the salaf did that; if it were good they would have done it before us. How well the poet spoke when he said:
All goodness is in following those who came before and all evil is in the innovations of those who came later.

Al-Silsilah al-Saheeh, vol. 6, section 1 (305-307).

And the Shaykh also said:

With regard to kissing the hand, there are many ahaadeeth and reports concerning that, which when taken together indicate that this is proven from the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). We think that it is permissible to kiss the hand of the scholar if the following conditions are met:

1. That it does not become a custom to such an extent that the scholar habitually stretches out his hand to his students and they habitually seek blessing by kissing his hand, because although the hand of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was kissed, that happened rarely, and such matters cannot be taken as a Sunnah to be done regularly, as is well known from the basic principles of fiqh.

2. That should not make the scholar feel arrogant towards others or admire himself, as happens among many shaykhs nowadays.

3. That should not lead to abandoning any well known Sunnah, such as shaking hands, which is prescribed because of the words and actions of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and is a shar’i means of the sins of those who shake hands being erased, as is narrated in more than one hadeeth. It is not permissible to supercede it or ignore it for another habit which, at best, is permissible.

Al-Silsilah al-Saheehah, 1/302.

Secondly:

With regard to bowing, that is not permissible when meeting anyone, whether he is a scholar or not.

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said:

With regard to bowing when meeting, it is forbidden as it is narrated in al-Tirmidhi that they asked the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) about a man who meets his brother and bows to him. He said: “No, because it is not permissible to bow or prostrate to anyone except Allaah, may He be glorified. That may have been done by way of greeting under a law other than ours, as in the story of Yoosuf – “…and they fell down before him prostrate. And he said: “O my father! This is the interpretation of my dream aforetime!” [Yoosuf 12:100].

But in our sharee’ah it is not permissible to prostrate to anyone except Allaah. Indeed it is forbidden to stand as the Persians used to stand for one another – so what about bowing and prostrating? And a slight bow (as opposed to the full bow as in prayer) is also included in this prohibition.

Majmoo’ al-Fataawa, 1/377

And he said:

With regard to lowering one's head before the senior shaykhs or kissing the ground etc, these are matters concerning which there is no dispute among the imams that they are haraam. Indeed, simply bowing to anyone other than Allaah is forbidden. In al-Musnad and elsewhere it is narrated that when Mu’aadh ibn Jabal (may Allaah be pleased with him) came back from Syria he prostrated to the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and he said: “What is this, O Mu’aadh?” he said: “O Messenger of Allaah, I saw them in Syria prostrating to their bishops and patriarchs, and they narrated that from their Prophets.” He said, “They are lying, O Mu’aadh. If I were to command anyone to prostrate to anyone else I would have told the women to prostrate to their husbands because of the greatness of their rights over them. O Mu’aadh, do you think that if you pass by my grave you will prostrate?” He said, “No.” He said: “Do not do that.”

In conclusion, standing, sitting, bowing and prostrating are all due to the One God, the Creator of the heavens and the earth. Whatever is a right only for Allaah, no one else can have a share in it, such as swearing by anyone other than Allaah etc.

Majmoo’ al-Fataawa, 27/92, 93.

The scholars of the Standing Committee said:

It is not permissible to bow when greeting or to take off one's shoes for someone.

And they said:

It is not permissible to bow in greeting to a Muslim or to a kaafir, not with the upper part of the body or with the head, because bowing is an act of worship and worship can only be done for Allaah alone.

Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz, Shaykh ‘Abd al-Razzaaq ‘Afeefi, Shaykh ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Ghadyaan, Shaykh ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Qa’ood.

Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah, 1/233, 234

And Allaah knows best.


Hence, it can be said that King Abdullah's action of banning citizens from kissing his hand and completely rejecting the matter is merely done out of his humility. May Allah bless him.