Dalam rangka membela Shaykh Rabee' bin Haadee al-Madkhalee, Ustaz Abu Farouq Rasul Bin Dahri memberi kuliah mengenai ucapan Dr Mohd Asri yang menuduh Shaykh Rabee' sebagai Khawarij.
Ustaz Rasul mendedahkan keta'ssuban Dr Asri terhadap tokoh-tokoh Ikhwanul Muslimin, di mana Dr Asri lebih banyak berhujjah dengan emosi, tanpa hujjah dan dalil konkrit.
Ustaz Rasul juga mendedahkan bahawa Dr Asri tidak memahami apa itu Khawarij, tidak pula mengenali siapa itu Shaykh Rabee'.
Kerana orang yang mencintai Ahlus Sunnah, akan mencintai Shaykh Rabee'.
Bak kata Shaykh Al-Albani, "Ketahuilah, barangsiapa mencintai Shaykh Rabee', maka dia mencintai Sunnah. Dan barangsiapa membenci Shaykh Rabee', maka dia membenci Sunnah."
Pada ketika lain, Shaykh Al-Albani berkta, "Sesungguhnya mereka berdua (Shaykh Rabee' dan Shaykh Muqbil) adalah pengibar bendera Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama'ah."
Hayatilah rakaman video ini dengan hati yang terbuka.
Apa Kata Mohd Asri Tentang Ikhwanul Muslimin (bhgn 2):
Apa Kata Mohd Asri Tentang Ikhwanul Muslimin (bhgn 3):
Apa Kata Mohd Asri Tentang Ikhwanul Muslimin (bhgn 4):
Apa Kata Mohd Asri Tentang Ikhwanul Muslimin (bhgn 5):
8 comments:
I am very disappointed at this entry.
When there are issue which surrounds the Muslims today globally from all angles - politically, socially, intellectually, theologically from agents of a non-Islamic root which only aims to breakdown the Muslims and the ummah from the its growth.
Yet, there are others internally and within Islam, whom knowingly and unknowingly are trying to break it up.
Wahai was Rasul Dahri in this lecture so emotional and defensive? Can't stand to be corrected?
What has Rasul Dahri done significantly for Islam and the ummah at large comparing to those whom he are so critical towards?
Dr Asri is doing good things in Perlis - creating a state moving away from taqlid and unprogressive traditional conventionalism?
Members of Ikhwanul Muslimeen whom have created a large impact within the ummah - many Muslim organizations have followed their style of tarbiyah and done up succesfully - fyi MSS is one of them.
Gamal Nassir - FYI was a nationalist. His style of politics is nothing close to Islamic.
Have we forgotten that Abd Aziz ibn Saud also when against the Ottoman empire - which is more of a Khilafah then what Gamal Nassir has ever achieved.
Why then do we not call And Aziz a khawarij rather consider him a catalyst of positive change?
what Abd Aziz did was commendable, so has Ikhwan Muslimeen and other Muslims towards that cause.
Move on to other issues and instead of just sitting in the classroom of only less then 30 people - move on and engage a larger audience and on bigger and worthy issues.
Emotional? Hmm.. Have you read the kertas kerja prepared by ustaz? Filled with concrete evidences from the books of Ikhwanul Muslimeen.
The lecture was delivered in defence of Shaykh Rabee' al-Madkhalee, due to the baseless accusations thrown at him.
Abd Aziz ibn Sa'ud went against Ottoman Empire? Have you studied the history ya akh? The province/state of Najd wasn't under Ottoman rule!
So how can ibn Sa'ud be said as going against Ottoman Empire?
Study thoroughly ya akh. Go read the book "Islamiyyah La Wahhabiyyah" by Dr Nashir bin Abdul Karim al-Aql.
Gamal Nasir might have been a nationalist but it is not the manhaj of the Salaf to wage a war against the ruler or strive to overthrow him.
The Salaf had rulers just as bad as Gamal Nassir or worse, but they never wage war against the rulers.
What you see is just a class. U didn't attend the kuliah that was supposed to be held at Masjid Abd Hamid Kg Pasiran but moved to Eunos.
The attendance was huge.
Rather, the question that should be asked, have you ever sat in Ustaz Rasul's class?
I'm not a fanatic of him but I shall defend him as deserved.
His da'wah is the very same da'wah of the scholars from past till present, the da'wah of calling upon Muslims to return to the Qur'an and Sunnah as understood by the Salaf as-Salih.
Has Ikhwanul Muslimin ever called to the da'wah of the Salaf? Has Ikhwanul Muslimin even strived at upholding the pure Tawheed?
No, but we find a variety of manhajs within Ikhwan itself, ranging from Soofees to Tablighees to Shi'ites.
Yes, Shi'ites. Hassan al-Banna' called for the coming together of Sunnis and Shi'ites, something against the manhaj of the Salaf.
How can we unite when our 'aqeedah is different?
We should always remember, the da'wah of the Prophets is calling to Tawheed.
Our beloved Prophet spent 13 yrs emphasizing Tawheed! 13 yrs!
But Hasan al-Banna gave little or no importance in Tawheed, what more purifying it within members of Ikhwanul Muslimeen.
That's briefly what i can say, otherwise this would have been another entry.
Wallahu a'lam.
Let's not forget, Dr Asri's lecture against Shaykh Rabee' was itself emotional, with no concrete evidences at all.
Wallahu a'lam.
Quote:The province/state of Najd wasn't under Ottoman rule!
Then who was the ruler of Najd ?
Who was the ruler of Najd at that time ?
I refer to the book Islamiyyah La Wahhabiyyah (in Malay) by Prof Nasr bin Abdul Karim al-Aqql.
During the time of Shaykh Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab, Najd was ruled by a number of amirs, who became a symbol of the leader of Bahrain, who at that time had splitted off from the khilafah.
During Ottoman rule, Muslim countries under its influence were divided into provinces, but Najd was never mentioned (i.e. not included).
Shaykh Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab never intended to leave the khilafah, neither to oppose it.
Uyaynah was ruled by the Amir Ibnu Mu'ammar while Dar'iyah was ruled by the Amir Ibnu Sa'ud.
Wallahu a'lam.
Pls refer to the book for a clearer picture.
Do note that Dr Asri here was being criticised with regards to the issue of Ikhwanul Muslimeen, not his efforts of implementing Sunnah, and leading the community to be progressive, as opposed to taqleed.
Personally, I regard Dr Asri as one who strives to uphold the Sunnah, and lead people to the correct understanding of the Qur'an and Sunnah.
No doubt he is to be criticised in certain matters, such as regarding Ikhwanul Muslimeen.
Neither do I deny that Ustaz Rasul was and has been harsh in his criticism towards Dr Asri, which i disagree too.
Wallahu al-Musta'an.
gado, gado, gado, takde kerja lain..
oii... mamat melayu gie urut2 ramai la, yg tak solat ramai la, yang isap tek pon ramai la, yg layan pelacur ramai la.. takde plak ko cite or usahakan slamat mereka nie.. yg ko salahkan orang2 yg baik dan soleh...
ini dok gado sama senirik, last kita jugak yg rugi.... masing2 tak leh nak toleransi... sume anggap diri senirik betul.. orang lain salah... tak leh terima ada khilaf dalam islam...
"ader ke ikhawan buat dakwah cara "salafi"?? " menda la ko nie... ko ingat cara dakwah ko jer ke btul... dah ko senirik yg define cara dakwah "salafi" ko tuh... maner ader orang nak sama ngn ko...
eiiii podah chit!!
Akhi Aboo......takpe katakan yg benar walaupun pahit untuk diterima .....barakallahufikum.
Post a Comment